<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Health Reform: 59 and counting... 60 Votes To Proceed To Debate</title>
	<atom:link href="http://swampland.blogs.time.com/2009/11/21/health-reform-59-and-counting/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://swampland.blogs.time.com/2009/11/21/health-reform-59-and-counting/</link>
	<description>A blog about politics.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 21 Mar 2010 07:39:11 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Re-election for Arkansas Dem. Blanche Lambert Lincoln (Maybe send her packing) &#171; Goodtimepolitics</title>
		<link>http://swampland.blogs.time.com/2009/11/21/health-reform-59-and-counting/comment-page-2/#comment-121793</link>
		<dc:creator>Re-election for Arkansas Dem. Blanche Lambert Lincoln (Maybe send her packing) &#171; Goodtimepolitics</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 08 Jan 2010 06:13:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://swampland.blogs.time.com/?p=18740#comment-121793</guid>
		<description>[...] (1)  59 and counting&#8230; 60 Votes To Proceed To Debate [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] (1)  59 and counting&#8230; 60 Votes To Proceed To Debate [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: sportyspicehalloweencostume &#187; Health Reform: 59 and Countingâ¦ 60 Votes To Proceed To Debate &#8230;</title>
		<link>http://swampland.blogs.time.com/2009/11/21/health-reform-59-and-counting/comment-page-2/#comment-113632</link>
		<dc:creator>sportyspicehalloweencostume &#187; Health Reform: 59 and Countingâ¦ 60 Votes To Proceed To Debate &#8230;</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 28 Nov 2009 05:20:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://swampland.blogs.time.com/?p=18740#comment-113632</guid>
		<description>[...] I agree with SZ to the limited extent that this does reveal institutional defects with our legislative process &#8212; what I previously referred to as the ugly sausage-making process. &#8230;.. If we don&#8217;t have the dollars of huge populations of Americans behind national-scale price negotiations with health care providers, we&#8217;re going to continue to overpay for health care state-by-state, and the choices will always be between the interests of those whose coverage is adequate and &#8230;More Here [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] I agree with SZ to the limited extent that this does reveal institutional defects with our legislative process &#8212; what I previously referred to as the ugly sausage-making process. &#8230;.. If we don&#8217;t have the dollars of huge populations of Americans behind national-scale price negotiations with health care providers, we&#8217;re going to continue to overpay for health care state-by-state, and the choices will always be between the interests of those whose coverage is adequate and &#8230;More Here [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: bouncer99</title>
		<link>http://swampland.blogs.time.com/2009/11/21/health-reform-59-and-counting/comment-page-1/#comment-112629</link>
		<dc:creator>bouncer99</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Nov 2009 16:09:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://swampland.blogs.time.com/?p=18740#comment-112629</guid>
		<description>In order to get a lively debate the senators need to go to the open market to realize the cost and the restrictions that come with medical insurance. With unemployment so high I am sure that everyone will have the opportunity to insure themselves without the fear of being rejected.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In order to get a lively debate the senators need to go to the open market to realize the cost and the restrictions that come with medical insurance. With unemployment so high I am sure that everyone will have the opportunity to insure themselves without the fear of being rejected.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: cfukara</title>
		<link>http://swampland.blogs.time.com/2009/11/21/health-reform-59-and-counting/comment-page-2/#comment-112555</link>
		<dc:creator>cfukara</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 22 Nov 2009 21:45:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://swampland.blogs.time.com/?p=18740#comment-112555</guid>
		<description>Rusty claims to own a small business.
Rusty worries a lot about employee costs. 
Small business owners put in long, busy hours.

Rusty spends many hours everyday typing and posting stuff into the SWAMP ....</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Rusty claims to own a small business.<br />
Rusty worries a lot about employee costs.<br />
Small business owners put in long, busy hours.</p>
<p>Rusty spends many hours everyday typing and posting stuff into the SWAMP ....</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: 53_3</title>
		<link>http://swampland.blogs.time.com/2009/11/21/health-reform-59-and-counting/comment-page-2/#comment-112547</link>
		<dc:creator>53_3</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 22 Nov 2009 20:47:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://swampland.blogs.time.com/?p=18740#comment-112547</guid>
		<description>Did anyone notice that Joe Klein&#039;s blog is not there anymore, or is this a Firefox thing?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Did anyone notice that Joe Klein's blog is not there anymore, or is this a Firefox thing?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: 53_3</title>
		<link>http://swampland.blogs.time.com/2009/11/21/health-reform-59-and-counting/comment-page-2/#comment-112538</link>
		<dc:creator>53_3</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 22 Nov 2009 20:11:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://swampland.blogs.time.com/?p=18740#comment-112538</guid>
		<description>I see, Rusty.
.
Nevermind the fact that you &lt;i&gt;&lt;b&gt;are&lt;/i&gt;&lt;/b&gt; a bigot and have clearly stated so in the past?  Eh?
.
And, btw, &lt;i&gt;&lt;b&gt;you skipped everything in between&lt;/i&gt;&lt;/b&gt;, so it&#039;s a nice dodge, but doesn&#039;t address any of my &lt;i&gt;&lt;b&gt;other&lt;/i&gt;&lt;/b&gt; comments.
.
Just like you failed to rebut the two you focused on.  Perhaps because you know you would be arguing against your own words?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I see, Rusty.<br />
.<br />
Nevermind the fact that you <i><b>are</b></i> a bigot and have clearly stated so in the past?  Eh?<br />
.<br />
And, btw, <i><b>you skipped everything in between</b></i>, so it's a nice dodge, but doesn't address any of my <i><b>other</b></i> comments.<br />
.<br />
Just like you failed to rebut the two you focused on.  Perhaps because you know you would be arguing against your own words?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: rustyreturns</title>
		<link>http://swampland.blogs.time.com/2009/11/21/health-reform-59-and-counting/comment-page-2/#comment-112529</link>
		<dc:creator>rustyreturns</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 22 Nov 2009 19:37:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://swampland.blogs.time.com/?p=18740#comment-112529</guid>
		<description>Amen, tincup</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Amen, tincup</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: rustyreturns</title>
		<link>http://swampland.blogs.time.com/2009/11/21/health-reform-59-and-counting/comment-page-2/#comment-112522</link>
		<dc:creator>rustyreturns</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 22 Nov 2009 19:34:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://swampland.blogs.time.com/?p=18740#comment-112522</guid>
		<description>The only source you provide IQ53 is a window into your stupidity.  
.
Racial accusations are &lt;b&gt;ALL&lt;/b&gt; that you can provide to any discussion.
.
You are indeed a very sad sad individual.  I won&#039;t waste any further time on your type.  You are simply a waste of human flesh and my time, period.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The only source you provide IQ53 is a window into your stupidity.<br />
.<br />
Racial accusations are <b>ALL</b> that you can provide to any discussion.<br />
.<br />
You are indeed a very sad sad individual.  I won't waste any further time on your type.  You are simply a waste of human flesh and my time, period.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: 53_3</title>
		<link>http://swampland.blogs.time.com/2009/11/21/health-reform-59-and-counting/comment-page-2/#comment-112515</link>
		<dc:creator>53_3</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 22 Nov 2009 19:13:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://swampland.blogs.time.com/?p=18740#comment-112515</guid>
		<description>meanjoegreen:
.
I&#039;m hoping against hope that this is a namesake, otherwise, you have the unenviable and most uncomfortable task of trying to explain your willingness to rub elbows with the likes of Rusty and others who simply hate you, your relatives, and mine as well.
.
As for your brainpower, I think I would stick to the simple stuff.  FOXworld is spoonfed feelgood for dittoheads, as far as I&#039;m concerned.
.
BTW, &lt;i&gt;fock&lt;/i&gt; &quot;socialism&quot; or &quot;communism&quot; or whatever other idiotic tag you want to apply.  
.
&lt;i&gt;&lt;b&gt;I want something that works, not some FOXworld crap that doesn&#039;t even pass the threshhold of sanity!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>meanjoegreen:<br />
.<br />
I'm hoping against hope that this is a namesake, otherwise, you have the unenviable and most uncomfortable task of trying to explain your willingness to rub elbows with the likes of Rusty and others who simply hate you, your relatives, and mine as well.<br />
.<br />
As for your brainpower, I think I would stick to the simple stuff.  FOXworld is spoonfed feelgood for dittoheads, as far as I'm concerned.<br />
.<br />
BTW, <i>fock</i> "socialism" or "communism" or whatever other idiotic tag you want to apply.<br />
.<br />
<i><b>I want something that works, not some FOXworld crap that doesn't even pass the threshhold of sanity!</b></i></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: 53_3</title>
		<link>http://swampland.blogs.time.com/2009/11/21/health-reform-59-and-counting/comment-page-2/#comment-112514</link>
		<dc:creator>53_3</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 22 Nov 2009 19:06:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://swampland.blogs.time.com/?p=18740#comment-112514</guid>
		<description>&lt;i&gt;&quot;No I did not plan on the higher taxes and an abrupt health insurance spike in coverage costs in order for the Government to fund a &quot;Public Option&quot;.&quot;&lt;/i&gt;
-------------------------------------------
We already had the spike, bozo.  My HC premiums just went up 15%.  And I might point out that your claim is only a claim - with no supporting facts.
-------------------------------------------
.
&lt;i&gt;&quot;There are two funding sources that the Democrats have proposed to fund this bill.&quot;&lt;/i&gt;
.
&lt;i&gt;&quot;1. Major cuts in Medicare.&quot;&lt;/i&gt;
-------------------------------------------
Nope.  There are some cuts, but the improvements in HC in other areas will offset this.  I will become a Medicare user in a few years, AND, my wife already uses it.  No fear here, rustybigot.  None at all.
-------------------------------------------
.
&lt;i&gt;&quot;2. Increasing taxes on businesses who make up the majority of those making over $250,000 / year, (gross revenue I might remind you). Taxing my employees current health care benefits which they do not pay any tax on at this time. Thus reducing their overall compensation package. Reducing their income I am confident they will want an increase in their wage. Wages that are already putting a higher cost to do business.&quot;&lt;/i&gt;
.
They all have Cadillac plans, right?  Ok.  Fair enough.  On taxing those making &lt;i&gt;above&lt;/i&gt; 250k, do you see any of my sympathy glands working after eight years of total fockups?
.
And of course, &lt;i&gt;&lt;b&gt;don&#039;t&lt;/i&gt;&lt;/b&gt; hand me any trickle-down sh!t, either rusty, &lt;i&gt;&lt;b&gt;because it led to the economic collapse&lt;/i&gt;&lt;/b&gt;.
.
&lt;i&gt;&quot;In order to increase the wages of those key essential employees, I will have to cut non-essential jobs.
.
Are you considered an essential employee, deconstructiva in your current job? I would look at that right now if I were you, and plan for the future if you are not.&quot;&lt;/i&gt;
.
I think the only individuals that would have to worry about losing their job at &lt;i&gt;your&lt;/i&gt; business are those who aren&#039;t white.
.
Not that you have anyone there who&#039;s not white there now...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>"No I did not plan on the higher taxes and an abrupt health insurance spike in coverage costs in order for the Government to fund a "Public Option"."</i><br />
-------------------------------------------<br />
We already had the spike, bozo.  My HC premiums just went up 15%.  And I might point out that your claim is only a claim - with no supporting facts.<br />
-------------------------------------------<br />
.<br />
<i>"There are two funding sources that the Democrats have proposed to fund this bill."</i><br />
.<br />
<i>"1. Major cuts in Medicare."</i><br />
-------------------------------------------<br />
Nope.  There are some cuts, but the improvements in HC in other areas will offset this.  I will become a Medicare user in a few years, AND, my wife already uses it.  No fear here, rustybigot.  None at all.<br />
-------------------------------------------<br />
.<br />
<i>"2. Increasing taxes on businesses who make up the majority of those making over $250,000 / year, (gross revenue I might remind you). Taxing my employees current health care benefits which they do not pay any tax on at this time. Thus reducing their overall compensation package. Reducing their income I am confident they will want an increase in their wage. Wages that are already putting a higher cost to do business."</i><br />
.<br />
They all have Cadillac plans, right?  Ok.  Fair enough.  On taxing those making <i>above</i> 250k, do you see any of my sympathy glands working after eight years of total fockups?<br />
.<br />
And of course, <i><b>don't</b></i> hand me any trickle-down sh!t, either rusty, <i><b>because it led to the economic collapse</b></i>.<br />
.<br />
<i>"In order to increase the wages of those key essential employees, I will have to cut non-essential jobs.<br />
.<br />
Are you considered an essential employee, deconstructiva in your current job? I would look at that right now if I were you, and plan for the future if you are not."</i><br />
.<br />
I think the only individuals that would have to worry about losing their job at <i>your</i> business are those who aren't white.<br />
.<br />
Not that you have anyone there who's not white there now...</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
