Joe Biden and The DNC Get It Wrong: The Big Insurance Lobby Is Not That Big
On Thursday, Vice President Joe Biden, who is traveling in Eastern Europe, sent out a warning to millions of Barack Obama's supporters through the Democratic National Committee's email list.
We've got a fight on our hands. Powerful insurance companies are pulling out all the stops to defeat the President's plan for health reform. They're spending seven million bucks a week on lobbyists, blanketing the country with deceptive TV ads, and just funded two high-profile "reports" to distort what reform would mean for you.
It read like a pretty standard Democratic fund-raising pitch: Big bad insurance companies are swamping Congress with big dollars, so we need your help. Later in the email, Biden made the ask. “Please contribute today,” he wrote.
The only problem was Biden got one big fact wrong.
It is not true that “powerful insurance companies” have been “spending seven million bucks a week on lobbyists.” In fact, health insurance companies make up a relatively minor part of the total health care industry's lobbying push, which is dominated by much bigger-spending drug companies.
According to the Center for Responsive Politics, which does the most authoritative coding of industry spending on lobbying, the insurance industry spent $40.8 million on lobbying in the second quarter of 2009, which works out to $448,653.04 per day. The second quarter spending by just health insurance companies and trade groups was even smaller, at $8.6 million, or $93,966.25 per day. That's a far cry from $1 million a day that Biden claimed.
It is true, however, that total lobbying by all sectors of the health care industry—drugs, medical devices, insurance, hospitals, doctors—has been running at a clip north of $7 million a week. According to the same bean counters, total second quarter lobbying by the health sector and health insurance was $144 million, or $1,580,276.63 per day. But that's not what Biden's fundraising email said.
When asked about the error, Brad Woodhouse, a spokesman for the Democratic National Committee, sent over a few news clippings pointing to the larger lobbying burn rate for the entire health care industry, including this Washington Post story which found in July that health care industry lobbying was running then at about $1.4 million a day. But that doesn't excuse the error, a fact Woodhouse admitted. "We used the wrong number here - which was an innocent mistake," he wrote in an email. "But anyone with access to a TV or the Internet knows that the health insurance industry has pulled out all the stops to preserve the status quo - and their profits."
Fund-raising pitches such as this one may be signed by Biden, but they are traditionally written over at the DNC. The factual blunder is particularly glaring for the White House and the Democratic Party, given their focus in recent weeks on “calling out” the factual errors of President Obama's opponents with big “reality check” blog posts.
They got bit by their own stinger--or whatever didactic adage you might choose to invoke. Perhaps,"People who live in glass houses should not throw stones"? Or maybe, "Live by the sword, die by the sword"? Or maybe the more sympathetic, "Nobody is perfect"?
-
1
Glad you get to the facts, Michael, but it is also quite humorous to see you essentially leap to the defense of insurance companies.
If only you had been so quick to call out the lies being spewed this summer by the lobbyist-funded hecklers grassroots tea party activists.
-
2
Don't think I am defending anything insurance companies are saying. But i do think that drug industry, which spends many millions more than health insurers buying influence, is getting away with something here. It is just not right to say the insurers are the major political money threat. It is just the case that the White House has not decided to go to war with the drug companies.
for more on this see the story that Karen and I did this week.
http://www.time.com/time/politics/article/0,8599,1931595,00.html
-
2.1
Michael-As we were all school by Jay Newton-Small yesterday. It isn't your job to tell us which claims are true are false
.
Don't get me wrong I appreciate the effort though. -
2.2
Getting away with something? What? First of all, we do have a constitutional right to petition the government for grievances. Second of all, lobbying is, to a large extent, self-protective. Elected officials stick their hands out and use the not so naked threat of retaliation if you don't play ball.
-
2.3
Don't you get it, Mr. Scherer? Your argument is ineffectively presented. Mr. Biden and the White House are very much on target and it would be worth your while to step back and actually learn more of what is being said on both sides, then look for truth. How can I say this to you, the all-knowing media? I'm in the medical insurance lobbying business...When VP Biden used the term "big" he knew exactly what he was saying. To refer readers to yet another story you've done with "Karen" is like the insurance lobby telling patients to trust them by reading additional material the insurance lobby has put out.
You really must be kidding.
-
-
3
That should have read "schooled" "true or false."
-
4
Michael Scherer and TIME Get It Wrong: Biden and the DNC don't say the insurers are the major political money threat.
Saying that the Insurance Industry is a major impediment against HCR is simply not the same as saying it is "THE the major political money threat"
See how easy that is?
The long standing position that KT and evidently MS of minimizing the influence of the Insurance Industry is really interesting to me.
Reminds me of Cokie Roberts with HCR last time around. Not that I'm suggesting anything.
-
5
I'd wondered where the old "Gotcha" Scherer had been.
Talk about "forest for the trees." Yeesh.
-
6
Yeah Scherer because being off on the exact amount the health insurance industry is spending every week alone rather than with their close compatriots is EXACTLY like calling people out for death panel lies.
.
Does anybody even read Time anymore? If so why would they? I mean at least we get to kick their sh*tty writers in the junk when they come with this weaksauce. But I wouldn't by a dead tree Time to wipe my arse with. Seriously.-
6.1
What's the matter, sgwhite, too busy celebrating the burning of Michael Brewer?
-
-
7
"The factual blunder is particularly glaring for the White House and the Democratic Party, given their focus in recent weeks on “calling out” the factual errors of President Obama's opponents with big “reality check” blog posts."
.
What about the 47 million? What about the "preventive care is cheaper"? What about the botched anecdote about the "reimbursement" for an amputation? What about the "docs cut out tonsils for profits"? Lots of other stuff out there too.
Most Popular »
- Sex and 'The Saboteur': Dev Talks Nudity in New Game
- My Life as a "Science Fetishist"
- Top 10 Shows of 2009: The Best, and the Rest
- CNN Poll: Man Made Global Warming Takes a Hit
- A Jobs Speech with Elbows
- War of the Supermen: Q&A With Matt Idelson
- The Top 10 Games of 2009
- Best of the Decade: Sci-Fi Movies
- The PlayStation Turns 15, We Reminisce
- CT Sen Poll: Dodd Trailing All Foes
- That Viral Thing: Facebook's Secret Code
- The Truth Behind the Leaked Climate-Change E-Mails
- College Degrees More Expensive, Worth Less in Job Market
- Mexico Witness Protection: Corrupt Program, New Killings
- Helicopter Parents: The Backlash Against Overparenting
- Taiwan: World's Lowest Birthrate Could Affect Society
- India's Friends: Dinner in the U.S., Dessert in Moscow
- Afghanistan War Surge: Might the Taliban Compromise Now?
- How Strong Is the Evidence Against Amanda Knox?
- U.S. Doesn't Know Where bin Laden Is; Time to Let Go














RSS