A blog about politics.

The Rise And Fall Of Levi Johnston

I fell into watching "Don't Look Back" last night, the great documentary of Bob Dylan's 1965 tour through England. Dylan never cared much for the press, even though, as the movie showed, he read the tabloids voraciously and spent a ton to time giving interviews. (He expresses this view in an extended verbal assault on a TIME magazine reporter, arguing that the magazine would get closer to reporting the "truth" if it printed a cut up montage of photographs than the rewritten "facts" that are its usual trade. See the exchange, which is great fun, here.)  And in retrospect, the concurrent reporting on Dylan's early rise was ridiculous. The press struggled mightily to fit Dylan into a box with questions about whether he was "folk" or "rock," "political" or not, and what his message was for the children. His music was, of course, far bigger, and deeper, than these labels could contain.

Now this may be a stretch, but I remember thinking something similar when I saw Levi Johnston at the Republican National Convention, standing on stage in St. Paul with Republican nominee John McCain and his pregnant girlfriend, Bristol Palin. He was so out of place, like a man who had arrived by time machine from the past, or by light speed from a distant galaxy. His world--rural Alaska, hockey, sex, high school, hunting--had almost nothing to do with the media hot box he had been thrown into. The press, meanwhile, struggled to put Levi into a box: What did he represent? Sex education works? It doesn't work? Premarital sex is inevitable? Avoidable? Etc. But none of the questions had much to do with Johnston. He was just a kid who got his girlfriend pregnant, and then, inexplicably, became famous for it.

Now here we are, a year later, and Levi Johnston has been transformed from media outsider--who like Dylan once had nothing to do with the press or its story lines--to a parody of himself, the star of his own unsigned reality show, made by and for the media machine. He is just another one of those people who has become famous for being famous. He does talk shows, gets followed by paparazzi, and, in his latest incarnation, gets photographed like a model, and paid (presumably) like a rock star, as a correspondent for Vanity Fair. The conceit of his Vanity Fair piece, which he "writes" for the October issue, is that he is going to spill newsworthy dirt on the family of his child's mother, an act that is without question dishonorable, but for which we all, from the sidelines, applaud, for the same reason that we slow down when passing car wrecks. For those who have any doubt about what is really going on, Vanity Fair has been kind enough to post a video online in which Johnston talks about the size of his penis and how many leafs it would take to cover his genitals, if they were photographed by Playgirl. (Now I have your attention, right? Sigh.)

He paints the Palin family in a withering light, one that appears based in fact, but is of questionable public value. Does it matter that the Palins may have slept in different beds, or that Sarah Palin did not make dinner, or asked her children to rent her videos from the store, or that she proposed adopting Johnston's child, or that she seemed depressed after the election and talked about the need to make more money? (Left unmentioned is the sum, which I do not know, that Vanity Fair paid Johnston for these revelations.)

Palin herself, it seems to me, is not in need of any private life take down. She is quickly succumbing to her own worst habits, posting distorted opinion pieces on her Facebook account, and, more recently, advising everyone to watch Glenn Beck, a man who identifies himself as not a reporter or political analyst, but as "the fusion of entertainment and enlightenment." Says former Governor Palin, "FOX News' Glenn Beck is doing an extraordinary job this week walking America behind the scenes of 1600 Pennsylvania Avenue and outlining who is actually running the White House."

If you want to know more about what Johnston reveals in his Vanity Fair cash cow, Marc Ambinder has additional details. But I cannot really bring myself to care. Johnston could have taught us all something--like Dylan before him--by ignoring the Klieg lights and going on with his life, becoming whoever it is that he should have become. Instead, he became something we have seen before, something to ogle and stare at, something not very interesting at all.

  • Print
  • Comment
Comments (57)
Post a Comment »
  • 1

    *sigh* Your post and the VF article fail to interest - even if you included the missing apostrophe-ess after Levi's name...

  • 2

    These are absolutely legitimate questions considering Palin made her family and this crisis such an integral part of her story at the convention and throughout the presidential race.

    http://www.political-buzz.com/

  • 3

    [...] Michael Scherer at Swampland at Time compares Levi Johnson to Bob Dylan. I fell into watching “Don’t Look Back” last night, the great documentary of Bob Dylan’s 1965 tour through England. Dylan never cared much for the press, even though, as the movie showed, he read the tabloids voraciously and spent a ton to time giving interviews. (He expresses this view in an extended verbal assault on a TIME magazine reporter, arguing that the magazine would get closer to reporting the “truth” if it printed a cut up montage of photographs than the rewritten “facts” that is its usual trade. See the exchange, which is great fun, here.)  And in retrospect, the concurrent reporting on Dylan’s early rise was ridiculous. The press struggled mightily to fit Dylan into a box with questions about whether he was “folk” or “rock,” “political” or not, and what his message was for the children. His music was, of course, far bigger, and deeper, than these narratives could contain. [...]

  • 4

    But I cannot really bring myself to care.

    Except to write six paragraphs on the subject.

    • 4.1

      Oh, snap!
      .
      Couldn't agree more, damack.

    • 4.2

      the problem here is that its perfectly acceptable for a magazine like Vanity Fair to do this kind of story -- its what they specialize in.

      But a magazine like Time should also ignore the story. Instead, they treat it as if its was significant.

  • 5

    Thanks Michael,

    After I initially read that Levi was going to dump the dirt on the Palins, I was tempted to purchase Vanity Fair. However, given that the Palins private life shouldn't be anyone business, I don't want to encourage the trash talk by buying the magazine.

    In all fairness to Johnson, it was Sarah Palin who thrust him into the limelight to take an example of how he was going to marry Bristol. It was clear at the Republican National Convention how much he didn't want to be there.

    If Sarah Palin is upset with the things Levi says, she has only herself to blame. Parading your family out in the media is no substitute for statemanship. Running for Vice President while your teenage daughter is pregnant is the epidemy of selfishness.

  • 6

    "… the star of his own unsigned reality show, made by and for the media machine. He is just another one of those people who has become famous for being famous."

    i.e., Jake Tapper.

  • 7

    Tabloid politics, is this your new beat, Michael? I'm not surprised that this hit the Swampland rag mag rack at all.

    I guess Obama's White House has to do anything it can to stop the downward spiral of his approval ratings.

    TIME used to be such a reputable organization.

  • 8

    "Instead, he became something we have seen before, something to ogle and stare at, something not very interesting at all."

    Only the lemming press was waiting for something interesting to happen so they could chase the ambulance. The people that actually hold this country together with sanity saw a shotgun wedding spun to look like a Christian lifestyle affirmation and a young man with limited prospects dealing with a bad media trap and trying to get some benefit from it before he mercifully fades away.

  • 9

    "standing on stage in Minneapolis"

    Not a big deal but what is it that so confuses people? Minneapolis and Saint Paul aren't actually the same place.

  • 10

    I forgot to add Michael. Why not do an epose' on Van Jones? You know, Obama's "Green Jobs Czar"?

    Van Jones, who is an avowed Communist. One of Obama's right hand men? To me that is much more current, and timely don't you think?

    Oh that's right, Glenn Beck is exposing them, I almost forgot. The commedian turned journalist, who outwits, out performs and out does everything on the far left.

    Yesterday Beck had this montage where he showed how much Rev Wright and Van Jones sound like each other. What they say about America, and how "evil" it is and how they are going to change America.

    Beck reports NEWS! Imagine that!

  • 11

    Hi guys - new poster but I'm pretty familiar with the dialogue and notorious flamers like rusty, spob and hulahate...

    But RE the subject: "[Johnston] paints the Palin family in a withering light..." MS mentions
    "Johns[t]on," "withering" and "penis" in same post. What gives?

  • 12

    He paints the Palin family in a withering light, one that appears based in fact, but is of questionable public value. Does it matter that the Palins may have slept in different beds

    No.

    or that Sarah Palin did not make dinner, or asked her children to rent her videos from the store

    No.

    or that she proposed adopting Johnson's child

    Maybe.

    or that she seemed depressed after the election and talked about the need to make more money?

    Yes, the woman was only the governor of Alaska and a former V.P. candidate. I like to think that her motivations and mental health are important.

  • 13

    Funny. Levi spilling hypocrisies about the Palins is a non-event according to the same guy who posted this:

    http://swampland.blogs.time.com/2009/05/05/elizabeth-edwards-book-excerpt-a-single-time-was-not-all/

    When Time excerpted Elizabeth Edwards' book.

    So dirt on Democrats is okay but Levi isn't worthy of the attention.

    Nice.

  • 14

    I'm surprised McCain's brain-trust, and all the conservative intellectuals, couldn't see the possibility of this train wreck coming?

  • 15

    Thank you, MS sir. For a minute I thought this was a Jon & Kate blog.

  • 16

    First Joe Klein's petty tirade about Glen Grenwald and now this. The stupidity of those in charge of the political dialogue in this country is astounding. Did Michael Scherer just compare Levi Johnson to Dylan? Idiocracy here we come.

  • 17

    You can't expect McCain to bearhug someone into the limelight and then expect that person to just slink back into the Alaskan fog.
    Look, you people still take McCain so seriously that he has had to be on the Sunday political shows something like 15 times since the election. If we are forced to put up with that angry and sanctimonious gasbag telling us what President would do if he wasn't such a losing McLoser, at least we should get to have the ongoing comedy routine the rest of his freak show provides: the Palin's, Levi Johnston, Joe the Plumber, the somehow now important Megan McCain.
    I'm not saying that anyone should take anything any of these people say or do seriously, but we should get to mock them and gaze dumbfounded at the trainwreck (hopefully from afar) as long as you traditional media types keep acting like Saint McCain won the election.

    • 17.1

      This is an excellent point. Why would people lecture Levi about heading back into obscurity? He's got the right to do whatever he wants after the McCain/Palin campaign tried so hard to use him as a prop.

    • 17.2

      On the whole I'd prefer the 'now important' Megan McCain to the 'wishes she were important' Liz Cheney.

  • 18

    Does Mikey respond to any criticism beyond spelling errors? I mean, his "bad" is the whole flipping People magazine post.

    • 18.1

      Apparently not. And I really want to know why some one who thinks the John Edwards affair is news thinks this isn't.

  • 19

    I can't believe you are wasting a moment's thought on this bit of prurient trivia. Worse, I can't believe that I'm wasting my time with your self-indulgence.

  • 20

    Michael me lad, I guess this be meanin' tha' yer previous attempt a' actual journalism be a' an end?
    .
    Pity - I were havin' such high hopes fer ye a' least attemptin' t' follow through' wi' th' truth project I were suggestin'...
    .
    Yarr

  • 21

    "He is just another one of those people who has become famous for being famous."
    .
    Just more ""reductio ad absurdium of modern American medio-politics". At least he isn't getting a gig on the Today Show. Yet.

    • 21.1

      Except that he's not famous for no reason. He's famous because John McCain and Sarah Palin made him part of a campaign for the presidency. He's not a Paris Hilton type in that sense. He's a kid who was used by the political establishment who is now giving them the business.

    • 21.2

      shepherd, maybe he won't get "Today" job but with Diane Sawyer replacing "In What Respect" Charlie Gibson, maybe LJ can take over at GMA...if Sarah doesn't get the gig first.

    • 21.3

      Hey, I'm not knocking the kid for exploiting a rotted system (that would be silly, especially if I was the obvious beneficiary of that very non-meritocratic system). Even if he got a serious journalism gig, it's hard for me to see how he could do that much worse a job than some disgraceful "journalists" who are still considered "successful" among their owners, managers and peers. For that matter, you could put him in charge of the CIA or the banking system. It's hard being a liberal elitist these days.

  • 22

    Jesus, Michael Scherer...
    .
    It's a lovely metaphor, and a novel one, but isn't your talent truly wasted on this sort of tabloidism?
    .
    I'm perfectly aware that this individual piece isn't the sum of what you cover, but...the Palin family saga?
    .
    Isn't your life too short to waste on this kind of thing?

  • 23

    The MSM have spent years making sure every private aspect of the Clintons' lives was made public.

    But now that a adored rightwing extremist's personal life is under scrutiny, the MSM suddenly develops scruples about examing private lives.

    I wonder if one can hurt one's self while simultaneously rolling one's eyes and vomiting.

  • 24

    I'm not sure why, but for some reason I think Levi should grab all the attention and cash he can as quickly as he can. What makes Levi less deserving than Paris Hilton, Jenna Bush, Cokie Roberts, Mike Wallace or Luke Russert and others who only got where they were because of their famous parents' work and not from working their way up from the bottom rung.

    Levi will never get another chance and if there fools out there willing to pay for what he thinks about any thing I say take it.

  • 25

    Yes I meant Chris. Not Mike. Thanks.

Add Your Comment:

You must be logged in to post a comment.
Swampland Daily E-mail

Get e-mail updates from TIME's Swampland in your inbox and never miss a day.

Quotes of the Day »

Get & Share
JOHN MCCAIN, Republican Senator of Arizona, offering support for President Obama's Afghanistan plan but adding that he opposes the 18-month timetable for withdrawal