Nurses: A Key to Health Care Reform
One of the few things that just about all sides agree upon in this health care debate is that we need more primary care providers -- lots more. And an already serious shortage will only get worse if we succeed in expanding coverage to some or all of the 47 million Americans who now lack it. That is one of the lessons of health care reform in Massachusetts, whose success in moving toward universal coverage has created what the Massachusetts Medical Society deems a "critical" need for internal medicine and family practice physicians.
The good news, however, is that there is a large army of reinforcements out there--primary care providers who are proving their worth every day, particularly in underserved areas like rural America. They're called ... nurses. More specifically, nurse practitioners. In 2006, there were nearly 145,000 nurse practitioners--registered nurses with advanced training--practicing in America. In 2007, another 3,700 graduated from masters degree and postmasters programs. (That same year, only 1,096* of the 2,603 family practice residencies offered to graduates of medical schools were filled.) Study after study has shown that the quality of primary care that the patients of nurse practitioners receive is as good or better than what they get from physicians, and that those patients are satisfied.
The problem is that nurse practitioners are often prevented by state regulation--and opposition by doctors' groups--from doing what they are trained to do. Though all 50 states now allow nurse practitioners to prescribe medication, for instance, the restrictions that are placed of them vary widely. In some states, they can operate independently; in others, they must have practically everything they do approved by a physician. And of course, the reimbursement they get is rarely commensurate with the value of the service that they are providing.
This morning, former HHS Secretary Donna Shalala and Pennsylvania Governor Ed Rendell--who has done much to empower the nurses in his state--will join with the American Academy of Nursing's Raise the Voice campaign in calling upon federal policymakers to make sure that nurses are given the role that they have earned in any drive to reform the health care system. Washington would do well to listen.
UPDATE: *Commenter plukasiak finds a link that corrects/clarifies one of the figures that I cited. But the point remains the same:
Karen, the 1096 number that you refer to is about the number of graduates of allopathic medical schools who were US citizens and who chose primary care for their residencies. The actual number of filled primary care residencies is 2,299.
Yet physicians continue to avoid primary care. This is most obviously apparent in the numbers from the "Match," the National Resident Matching Program process by which senior medical students select residency positions. A total of 2,299 of the 2,603 positions available for residency training in family medicine in 2007 were filled by 87 U.S. physicians who were prior-year graduates of U.S. allopathic medical schools, nine graduates of the Fifth Pathway, 335 U.S. citizens who were graduates of international medical schools, 538 non-U.S. citizens who were graduates of international medical schools, 227 osteopathic physicians and 1,096 U.S. citizens who were allopathic senior medical students.
UPDATE2: After the jump, a five-point proposal just unveiled by the National Nursing Centers Consortium:
The National Nursing Centers Consortium, a non-profit organization comprised of Nurse-Managed Health Centers throughout the country, has a five-point plan with new ideas to increase access to health care, improve care for patients with chronic diseases, and improve the efficiency of the health care system:
* Ensure Access to Care for the Underserved by Protecting the Government's Investment in Nurse-Managed Health Centers. Many Nurse-Managed Health Centers are affiliated with academic schools of nursing, and received federal start-up funding through the HRSA Division of Nursing. Although these centers serve a high percentage of uninsured patients, they often cannot qualify for the enhanced resources that the government offers Federally Qualified Health Centers (FQHCs). By increasing funding and reimbursement for this innovative model of care, the government can encourage the sustainability of existing primary care access points and help health centers offset the high costs of providing care to uninsured, low-income and vulnerable families.
* Improve Geriatric and Chronic Care by Adopting an Inclusive Definition of the “Medical Home.” Nurse practitioners are currently excluded from participating in a number of “medical home” initiatives – including the Medicare Medical Homes demonstration project administered by CMS – despite the fact that Nurse-Managed Health Centers serve as full-fledged primary care homes for hundreds of thousands of individuals. To ensure that America's increasing population of seniors has access to high-quality, comprehensive primary care models, it is essential that the concept of the “medical home” be expanded to include nurse-led practices.
* Create More Efficient Infrastructure for Health Care Administration. Even though the process of provider credentialing is essentially the same for every insurer, providers must submit multiple credentialing applications to all insurers in his or her market. A unified credentialing clearinghouse for all health care providers could reduce or eliminate unnecessary delays and redundancies in the credentialing process. This could reduce administrative costs in health centers by 25 percent.
* Increase Opportunities for Health IT Implementation. Nurse practitioners and Nurse-Managed Health Centers must have the same opportunities as other providers to take part in initiatives designed to improve primary care outcomes. To achieve this, the government must fund Health IT initiatives outside of its existing funding frameworks, which tend to focus on physician-led practices and existing FQHCs. Given the nation's growing shortage of primary care physicians, it is critical that the government ensures that Nurse-Managed Health Centers have access to incentives that would allow them to implement new Health IT initiatives and improve quality of care for their patients.
* Invite New Players to Join the Health Reform Discussion. Nurse practitioners are the fastest growing group of primary care professionals in the country. Although nurse-managed care models are a relatively new movement in health care, they reach large numbers of patients throughout the country. These providers have new ideas that promise to increase the accessibility and affordability of health care in the United States. Without their voices at the health reform table, we may lose the opportunity to implement a more interdisciplinary, team-based model of health care.
-
1
Malpractice lawyers, particularly those of the lecherous John Edwards-ian type, would have a field day tearing apart nurses in court. Medical tort reform, then empower the nurses.
.
BTW, I can't open your any of your pdfs, KT. -
2
They open for me. Anyone else having that problem?
-
3
KT, they open fine for me.
-
4
Seems to be a Firefox problem as IE looks ok. Regardless, good post.
-
5
The solutions are out there. We just have to be smart enough to make use of them.
They opened for me too on Adobe. -
6
visciousmaniac -- I have no idea how Edwards personal foibles has anything to do with being a trial lawyer. Clearly, you know that anyone from any side of the aisle is capable of adultery. Seems to me that the "lecherous John Edwards-ian type" is just a bit too gratuitous and patently unfair to the profession.
-
7
KT: OT, but since it's Friday...if you leave us a captioning contest photo (maybe the republican pizza party) we'll be a little more circumspect in our hijacking ways.
-
8
dee: that, however, gets to an interesting idea i heard the other day from a white house official. one way to get around all the objections to using comparative effectiveness research is not to mandate them, but to make "best practices" a defense in malpractice lawsuits.
-
9
sacred: will look for something this afternoon.
-
10
KT: Thank you so much. We had to be hijack everything in sight last friday and we all felt so guilty. Happy Mother's Day on Sunday too from all your Swampcritter "kids" in the Swamp.
-
11
"opposition by doctors' groups"
.
The best I could find with a quick Google search was a story from 2006 in the St Louis Post-Dispatch.
.
Do you have a link handy, KT? -
12
I meant "treacherous" actually, not "lecherous".
As in "insidious", "deceptive". I'm quite serious. It was a late evening yesterday. At any rate, Edwards' medical tort career is in fact quite "treacherous". He himself came to rebuke the very ambulance chasing he pioneered, in the end (though in grand Washington politician fashion, not, of course, HIS own ambulance chasing).
.
Regarding the pdfs, updating Firefox Adobe plugins seems to work (if you are trying to view them in the browser as I was). -
13
P-NNTO: Have it in a .pdf that I can't figure out how to post here. AMA often works with state dr groups "in identifying and lobbying against laws that allow advanced practice nurses to provide medical care without the supervision of a physician," and opposes the independent practice of nurse practitioners (AKA competition). When I get to the office, I will try to figure out how to post. It's a document called "the primary care paradigm shift."
-
14
P-NNTO: found a link. not sure it opens.
.
https://www.policyarchive.org/handle/10207/11855 -
15
I just found this KT. An AMA story on topic.
.
http://www.ama-assn.org/amednews/2008/04/21/prl20421.htm
.
The rub seems to be supervision, not an unreasonable concern. -
16
P-NNTO: If you see the variance in state laws on this subject, you wonder whether the supervision requirements are in the patients' interest or the doctors.
-
17
I'm just reading and learning about this now KT. Your link opened btw. It read as an advocacy piece, which is fine, but I'm trying to learn both sides rather than impugn the motives of the parties.
-
18
(That same year, only 1,096 of the 2,603 family practice residencies offered to graduates of medical schools were filled.)
Karen, the 1096 number that you refer to is about the number of graduates of allopathic medical schools who were US citizens and who chose primary care for their residencies. The actual number of filled primary care residencies is 2,299.
Yet physicians continue to avoid primary care. This is most obviously apparent in the numbers from the "Match," the National Resident Matching Program process by which senior medical students select residency positions. A total of 2,299 of the 2,603 positions available for residency training in family medicine in 2007 were filled by 87 U.S. physicians who were prior-year graduates of U.S. allopathic medical schools, nine graduates of the Fifth Pathway, 335 U.S. citizens who were graduates of international medical schools, 538 non-U.S. citizens who were graduates of international medical schools, 227 osteopathic physicians and 1,096 U.S. citizens who were allopathic senior medical students.3
_
http://physician-assistant.advanceweb.com/Editorial/Content/Editorial.aspx?CC=114722 -
19
Now this makes sense KT. Very good article. In order for any type of "Universal Healthcare" to be implemented, you must first have the providers in place to provide the care.
.
Pennsylvania has been in the dark ages so far as APNs and CNPs abilities to provide needed care, especially in rural communities. The legislation that Rendell has fostered and the House/Senate approved are great leaps forward for medical coverage for all Pennsylvanians. -
20
My reaction is slightly different than your in one regard.
When you refer to "nearly" 145,000 my reaction is only 145,000?!
Of couyrse this is related:
reimbursement they get is rarely commensurate with the value of the service that they are providing.
.
As far as tort reform goes, that is a sticky subject in all directions. Bad medical care is a real problem that needs to be guarded against, but the authority and trust we put in doctors far exceeds their actual ability to affect outcomes. Serious amount of magical/wishful thinking goes on surrounding our health and the desire to find someone to blame when things go poorly is strong and highly exploitable.
. -
21
I suspect a lot of folks will insist on seeing a doctor even when a nurse is available.
-
22
KT -- This is more complex than you describe. Managed care programs don't pay fair market value in reimbusments. CMS regulations are cumbersome. Even the introduction of Associate Degreed nurses doesn't change what nurses are paid, and the shortage keeps growing.
From the ANA "The American Nurses Association (ANA) strongly supports the President Obama's latest FY 2010 budget, which provides $1 billion for the Health Resources and Services Administration (HRSA) health care workforce development programs, and improves access to health care in underserved areas. The proposed budget includes $263 million, an increase of $92 million, in Title VIII programs to address the growing nursing shortage. It provides $125 million, a 238% increase, to fund nurses serving in critical shortage facilities, supplies increased funds for scholarship and loan repayment awards, and adds an estimated 550 additional nurse faculty educators to ensure nursing schools have the capacity to educate and train the next generation of nurses."
This is not a lot of money, KT.
-
23
Bravo, rusty! Constructive contribution to the discussion!
.
matt – in much of rural America the question is whether there's even a nurse available. Medical attention from a qualified nurse looks pretty good when there's no doc nearby. -
24
We do it already but we might have to increase the amount of legal immigrants to enter this country in order to make up for the lack of nurses, doctors and other primary care providers. Karen, have you heard anything regarding that solution?
-
25
I don't know about the rest of you, but if I have a simple ailment (sinus infection, sprain, small wound, etc) I would rather have quick access to a nurse practioner than have to wait two days to see my regular doctor or go to the emergency room. If the nurse thinks I should see a doctor I will go. I can't imagine them providing any worse a service than my local ER. My regular physician is always swamped. I'm sure he would be glad to have the extra time for his more pressing patients.
Most Popular »
- "Personal Sins Should Not Require Press Releases"
- False Economy: Think You're Saving Money? Think Again
- The 'Alice' Interview: A Very Different Brand of Wonderland
- Congress's Tepid Reaction to Obama's Afghanistan Plan
- Tiger Speaks
- Gleeks and Shrieks: Fox Unveils Midseason, Glee Gone Until April
- State Dinner, Uh, Fashion
- White House Hypocritical Attack on Politico
- The Dreaded X
- First Look: 'Lovely Bones' and Peter Jackson's Virtuoso Vistas
- Can Attack Dogs Be Rehabilitated?
- Helicopter Parents: The Backlash Against Overparenting
- Italian Town Dreams of a White (No Foreigners) Christmas
- Rachel Uchitel: Tiger Woods' Alleged Affair Connection
- Europe's Secret Nuclear Weapons: What Should NATO Do?
- Why Fritz Henderson Resigned as GM's CEO
- Ireland: Lack of New Catholic Priests Spurs Campaign
- Study: Loneliness Can Be Contagious
- The End of the 2000s: Goodbye to a Decade from Hell
- Could White House Party Crashers the Salahis Go to Jail?














RSS