Air Pelosi? Uh, not so much...
There was much tut-tutting over Judicial Watch's allegation earlier this week that Nancy Pelosi "treats the Air Force like her personal airline." But over at ABC, Jonathan Karl and Luis Martinez actually read this "trove" of documents on what Michelle Malkin calls "Queen Nancy's military air travel." And what did they find?
In fact, it appears that Pelosi uses military aircraft less often than her predecessor, former Speaker of the House Dennis Hastert.
The documents cover the period from January 2007 to November 2008 and show that Pelosi made the equivalent of 20 round-trips between Washington (Andrews Air Force Base) and San Francisco. That's an average of less than one round-trip per month. In contrast, former Speaker Hastert traveled home to his Illinois district virtually every weekend and, his former aides tell ABC News, he would almost always travel on military aircraft. Like Hastert, Pelosi also occasionally leads Congressional delegations on foreign trips (the documents show six foreign trips: one to Asia, three to the Middle East and two to Europe).
The documents obtained by Judicial Watch also disprove another frequently repeated rumor about Pelosi's travel: that she regularly flies home to San Francisco in an Air Force C-40, the military equivalent of a Boeing 737. According to the documents, Pelosi did not make any domestic trips on a C-40 during the 23-month period from January 2007 to November 2008. Her trips to San Francisco have all been on smaller executive aircraft, usually an Air Force C-20 (the equivalent of a Gulfstream G-3) or a more plush C-37 (a Gulfstream G-5).
The Judicial Watch release cites e-mails from the military complaining that Pelosi was frequently reserving military aircraft and then canceling, causing the Air Force to incur costs as crews prepped planes than never went anywhere. These e-mails, however, are from early in her tenure as speaker.
The only other time the issue of cancelled flights comes up is when Pelosi was forced to cancel flights to California in October 2008, when the House was in the midst of intense debate over the $700 billion Emergency Economic Stabilization Act. The Defense Department official seems to fully understand the situation, writing, "I do not see malice or a lack of urgency on their parts given the weekend Hill proceedings. Obviously we all need to keep leaning forward. It's the right thing to do."
The Judicial Watch release also cites an e-mail from a Pelosi staffer complaining about the lack of available C-5 aircraft for Congress's 2007 Memorial Day recess, but this has nothing to do with Pelosi's travel. Instead, the staffer was trying to arrange travel for eight Congressional delegations (all such travel is arranged through Pelosi's office).
UPDATE: Against my better judgment, I'm responding to this from Michelle Malkin:
As I reported (yeah, we can do that, too, MSM), one of the most notable e-mail exchanges I found in the docs (which was not spotlighted in JW's release, but could be found by anyone who actually clicked through on JW's site to the actual records) dealt with Pelosi's absurd demand in December 2008 (that's just three months ago, not “early in her tenure”) that the military move her jet from San Francisco airport to Travis Air Force base (where she had “business” and where she just so happens to have a country home nearby in Napa 30 minutes away!) Queen Pelosi didn't want to drive 1.5 hours. She demanded that the military come to her. DoD officials pointed out that this had never been done before — not even for the Defense Secretary.
But Pelosi is not the first to make such a request. In reading the email traffic for former House Speaker Dennis Hastert, we find this on Page 70:
Hastert didn't want to drive 14 extra miles. Are requests like this pretty? Nope. But they are not unprecedented either.
-
1
Baseless and Hypocritical Smear Tactics? In my GOP?
.
...it's more likely than you think. -
2
Thanks for posting this, KT. I hope Question Rusty/Hulgate etc reads this post.
-
3
It wouldn't hurt to point out that the Speaker of the House is in the line of succession should something happen to the President and Vice President. But of course the WingNuts never pay attention to that unless the Speaker is a Republican. Then they want them to have a 24 hr Secret Service detail. Thanks for the post K Tizzle.
-
4
Wow,
.
Michelle Malkin turns out to be full of $#!^......
.
Imagine my shock! -
5
Personally, regardless of whether Pelosi is doing it less than Hastert, its still wrong. While I don't mind Congresscritters getting rides home on scheduled military flights, the military should not be treated as their own personal air fleet.
_
Let Pelosi fly commercial -- and be reimbursed only for "cheap" commercial, not first class. -
6
Do you think this factual information has any chance of being noticed on the other side of the Partisan Wall?
-
7
pluk: this all started after 9/11, and the speaker is third in line of presidential succession. but i agree that it is probably going overboard and doesn't look so good.
-
8
pluk
.
You do realize WHY the Speaker of the House rides military aircraft right? Do you think the President should fly commercial also? -
9
Thanks for pointing this out KT! Now what will Hula have to rant about?
And yes...that was a snark. -
10
The day Malkin stops raging at every single human being to her political left is the day her income stops.
-
11
"treats the Air Force like her personal airline." like "A billion dollars an hour" shows yet again how empty the republicans are.
.
Imagine how effective they might one day be when they stumble across something to criticize that isn't demonstrably false. -
12
You know the funny thing is that entire journalistic industries are being built primarily to combat right wing lies. Thats pretty much the reason for factcheck.org, politifact.com and snopes to even exist. Yeah there are some Democratic lies as well but if you go to one of those sites its pretty one sided as far as whose lies they have to debunk on a regular basis. And yet there is a section of the population who still believes anything Malkin or Hannity say.
-
13
PD:
.
True dat – double true.
.
"Discrediting Malkin" is the new "coals to Newcastle." -
14
Someone take the sharp objects out of Halperin's and Scherer's offices.
-
15
I'm telling you KT give us marching orders and we'll do research so you can write that award winning investigative report showing the disparity between the two parties about relationships with the truth.
.
KT you know that eventually somebody is going to do it, probably after it will no longer do any good though. but I can see the five part series now: Truth the last casualty of the culture war in Washington. -
16
..i agree that it is probably going overboard and doesn't look so good...
.
I could care less about whether it "looks good", i.e. if Pelosi's political enemies can get the scandal-hacks at Politico to write about it, but whether it is good or not.
.
I think that the security of the Speaker should be weighed against the democratic value of persons in elite positions being forced to encounter the same everyday problems that we non-elites encounter, instead of being forced into not sharing their constituents' contexts.
.
The legislature can only truly be the people's representative body if it is fundamentally of the people, IMO. -
17
As a frequent business traveler I absolutely want the speaker on the military plane. For her security and mine. I don't want some maniac targeting a plane I am on becaue the speaker is on it.
-
18
When does Hula get out of school today? She's gonna be apoplectic! I'm anticipating an apple-juice-and-graham-cracker-crumb spit take, once she gets to her room & checks this post. Have you no pity, KT?
-
19
Was it necessary to link to the notorious bigot, racist, and serial harasser/stalker Michelle Malkin to report on this story?
-
20
Where are the quotes from Leftosi's haranguing staffers to our military personnel? Did anyone from Hastert's offices EVER pull such crap?
Hello?
Anyone homer?
This is not a news story.
This is a limp defense of the WASTE & ABUSE status quo in Congress.
Here's an idea:
FLY COACH like the rest of us (including most business managers with a hell of a lot more economic reality than Air Mathless).
-
21
What the Queen Media Bee of Medicrap fails to include IS Leftosi's staff treating our troops like her personal flight and ground crew (worse, actually), in language that was best suited to the LOATHE THE MILITARY malaise days of the Clixons (another abusive frequent flier cadre on the taxpayer's dime).
...
-- How many times did brave and frugal Fancy include, not at her particular convenience, others not related to her specific party plans, to fly with her back to caring Cali when it didn't particularly suite her hair chipping schedule?
-- Did she accommodate anyone beyond her personal staff and family, en route?
-- How many trips were taken during any period of highest national security, that would require military aircraft?
-- How many hemp huts does that come to, flying virtually solo across the Hate States, in planes designed and paid for MILITARY use, and how many military trips had to be altered or canceled to accommodate her personal schedule?
-- Trips that amounted to fundraisers and political forays, using federal aircraft?
Keep flapping your rotary wings, KT.
Just try to avoid the fuel tanker next to the NCO Club.
-
22
I wonder how hula felt about Hastert doing the same thing only more often. Of course we will never know because wingnuts like him were happy with whatever their dear leaders did in the Republican Party. IOKIYAR rules their world and their discourse.
-
23
Myself, I'd prefer to see elected officials using the same transportation systems ordinary citizens use. It's also my opinion that this hyper-paranoid security thing is part of the vibe that keeps us on a war footing.
-
24
Personally, regardless of whether Pelosi is doing it less than Hastert, its still wrong. While I don't mind Congresscritters getting rides home on scheduled military flights, the military should not be treated as their own personal air fleet.
Let Pelosi fly commercial -- and be reimbursed only for "cheap" commercial, not first class.
............
Indeed, and what thinking terrorist would actually target one of their leading spokespeople?
-
25
hyper-paranoid security thing is part of the vibe that keeps us on a war footing.
.
Sorry jayackroyd, its one thing not to invade countries on a whim and its another to ignore security concerns altogether.
Most Popular »
- Is Harry Reid Burning Out?
- Best of the Decade: Sci-Fi Movies
- Best of the Decade: Gadgets
- Economists Growing More Wary of the Senate Health Bill
- TV Tonight: Men of a Certain Age
- What Barack Obama Really Thinks Of The White House Press
- Gallup: Obama Approval Sinks to 47
- The PlayStation Turns 15, We Reminisce
- The Five Most Underrated Sci-Fi Masterpieces
- 135 Money-Saving Resources and Tips, Special Holiday Season Edition
- Tiger Woods Must Face His Fans' Moral Outrage
- The Stolen E-Mails: Has 'Climategate' Been Overblown?
- How Strong Is the Evidence Against Amanda Knox?
- Helicopter Parents: The Backlash Against Overparenting
- Study: Parents' Sex Talks with Kids Happening Too Late
- Five Flawed Assumptions of Obama's Afghan Surge
- Humanure: Goodbye, Toilets. Hello, Extreme Composting
- Jerusalem: Israelis, Palestinians in Deadlock Over Site
- The End of the 2000s: Goodbye to a Decade from Hell
- Amanda Knox Guilty Verdict: Did She Get a Fair Trial?















RSS