The White House Weighs In On Burris Imbroglio
On the Air Force One flight from Phoenix to Washington, White House Spokesman Robert Gibbs made his first public comment about the recent revelations concerning Sen. Roland Burris. Here is a transcript of the exchange.
QUESTION: You were asked a couple times yesterday about the President's reaction to the revelations about Roland Burris. Have you had a chance to talk to him? Does he have a reaction?
GIBBS: I have to say I have neglected to speak with him, but I will give you this: Obviously the people of Illinois have been through a lot in the past few weeks. And obviously Sen. Burris was seated based in some way on the representations that he made to the U.S. Senate and to the committee in Illinois investigating Gov. Blagojevich and as well in interviews that the people of Illinois heard. I think in many ways he was seated based on those representations, and I think that the people of Illinois deserve to know--based on some of the things that have happened over the past few days--deserve to know the full extent of any involvement, and I think that is likely to come out as part of some of the investigations that are now ongoing.
QUESTION: He has acknowledged that the extent of his contacts with Gov. Blagojevich were substantially more than what he originally owned up to. Should he resign? There have been calls for that from both sides of the aisle in Illinois.
GIBBS: I'm not going to get ahead of investigations and say anything like that yet.
QUESTION: Is it fair to say though that you are suggesting that Mr. Burris misrepresented his involvement before?
GIBBS: I wouldn't suggest. I think you should quote what I said.
-
1
I hope Burris hasn't made himself TOO comfortable in Washington.
-
2
http://www.breitbart.com/article.php?id=D96E4E781&show_article=1
... ... ...
With a RACIST running the DOJ, why should Burris even worry?
Oh, right.
Rahm.
-
3
[...] to Swampland, Gibbs was asked about Obama's reaction to Burris's ever changing story, I have to say I have [...]
-
4
It's not all that shocking that a prominent illinois politician would have dealings with the illinois governor. However, from day one of the Burris appointment I've been saying he should have declined it. He clearly cares more about his personal ambitions than his constituents, and accepting the Blago nomination was a dead end, he was never going to win re-election off of it. What he should have done, was reject the nomination, makes a bunch of speeches blasting Blago, say that there was nothing innapropriate but he wouldn't want to tarnish his reputation by associating himself at all with the man, and then maybe he'd have had a chance in a special election or in a few years for an honest election. But by even loosely tieing himself to Blago by accepting the nomination, he doomed his entire political career. This is just the icing on the cake. Whether or not he's booted out of office (I don't care either way, I'll wait to see how the investigations fall), he's not going to be in that seat for long.
-
5
[...] if (daym=12) dn="PM" if (hours>12){ hours=hours-12 } if (hours==0) hours=12 if (minutes Gibbs says the Illinois Senator should clarify any contact he has had with Blago or his associates while speaking to reporters [...]
-
6
Executive power is vested in the President by Congress with the advice and consent of the Senate so that he may preserve protect and defend the Constitution and the laws of the United States.
The principal responsibility of the President is to "take care that the laws be faithfully executed." By using these words, the Constitution does not require the President to personally enforce the law; rather, officers subordinate to the President may perform such duties.
The Constitution, empowers the President to ensure the faithful execution of the laws made by Congress. Congress may itself terminate such appointments, by impeachment, and restrict the President.
The President's responsibility is to execute whatever instructions he is given by the Congress.
Not the other way around.
Whatever the White House or Barack Hussein Obama feels about who serves in Congress and what that test should require, is none of his business.
Burris, and the rest of us, should rebuke his intrusion into Congressional matters, and respectfully ask him to butt out.
He's got enough problems keeping up with the crooks he chose to serve in his Cabinet.
- michaelscherer Speaking of Mars, these may be the best lyrics of any non-Dylan song: http://bit.ly/4nfnz5 - 1 hour ago
- michaelscherer Mars is super cool. http://bit.ly/4b0IBH - 1 hour ago
- michaelscherer My favorite newish piece of political rhetoric in Obama's speech today: "waxing political." Sort of like waxing lyrical, except not. - 6 hours ago
Most Popular »
- Best of the Decade: Sci-Fi Movies
- "How Will Dave Ever Make Fun of Sex Scandals Again?"
- Is Harry Reid Burning Out?
- How Will Obama Pay For Stimulus 2.1? (or 3.0, 3.1, whatever you want to call it)
- Why Wells Fargo isn't paying back TARP
- CNN Poll: Man Made Global Warming Takes a Hit
- The Health Reform Abortion Wars, Part Deux
- War of the Supermen: Q&A With Matt Idelson
- Economists Growing More Wary of the Senate Health Bill
- Quinnipiac: Obama Gets Bump on Afghanistan
- The Truth Behind the Leaked Climate-Change E-Mails
- Mexico Witness Protection: Corrupt Program, New Killings
- Tiger Woods Must Face His Fans' Moral Outrage
- Helicopter Parents: The Backlash Against Overparenting
- Taiwan: World's Lowest Birthrate Could Affect Society
- Creating Jobs: Can Obama Government Boost Employment?
- How Strong Is the Evidence Against Amanda Knox?
- U.S. Doesn't Know Where bin Laden Is; Time to Let Go
- Suspect Headley: Pakistani Terrorist Group Going Global?
- Humanure: Goodbye, Toilets. Hello, Extreme Composting
Quotes of the Day »
RSS