Obama's Stimuli
Obama today is expected to give a “major” speech on the economy this afternoon at George Mason University in Fairfax, Virginia, probably the first of many to convince “some [that] might be skeptical of the plan,” as he says in excerpts e-mailed to reporters this morning. Just when we thought the eternal campaign was over… But I digress. Obama cautions that unless his proposed $775 billion stimulus is passed, the economy “could become dramatically worse” to the tune of double-digit unemployment
The president-elect repeats his warning of short-term deficits. “There is no doubt that the cost of this plan will be considerable. It will certainly add to the budget deficit in the short-term,” he says, adding, “but at this particular moment, only government can provide the short-term boost necessary to lift us from a recession this deep and severe. Only government can break the vicious cycles that are crippling our economy.”
For the naysayers, Obama pledges to cross the aisle in finding the best programs. “Our government has already spent a good deal of money, but we haven't yet seen that translate into more jobs or higher incomes or renewed confidence in our economy,” he says. “That's why the American Recovery and Reinvestment Plan won't just throw money at our problems – we'll invest in what works. The true test of the policies we'll pursue won't be whether they're Democratic or Republican ideas, but whether they create jobs, grow our economy.” Here's my story out today about what is on the table so far on the stimulus. Obama may be talking to Republicans in person but those staffers who worked through the Holidays were, I'm told, all Democrats. “This was a Dems-only process,” one Senate GOP aide told me. We still haven't gotten the details of the bill yet but so far there hasn't been much in this stimulus that's new – beyond his campaign promises – or much work with the other side.
For full excerpts see after the jump.
Excerpts:
I don't believe it's too late to change course, but it will be if we don't take dramatic action as soon as possible. If nothing is done, this recession could linger for years. The unemployment rate could reach double digits. Our economy could fall $1 trillion short of its full capacity, which translates into more than $12,000 in lost income for a family of four. We could lose a generation of potential and promise, as more young Americans are forced to forgo dreams of college or the chance to train for the jobs of the future. And our nation could lose the competitive edge that has served as a foundation for our strength and standing in the world.
In short, a bad situation could become dramatically worse.
***
There is no doubt that the cost of this plan will be considerable. It will certainly add to the budget deficit in the short-term. But equally certain are the consequences of doing too little or nothing at all, for that will lead to an even greater deficit of jobs, incomes, and confidence in our economy. It is true that we cannot depend on government alone to create jobs or long-term growth, but at this particular moment, only government can provide the short-term boost necessary to lift us from a recession this deep and severe. Only government can break the vicious cycles that are crippling our economy – where a lack of spending leads to lost jobs which leads to even less spending; where an inability to lend and borrow stops growth and leads to even less credit.
That is why we need to act boldly and act now to reverse these cycles. That's why we need to put money in the pockets of the American people, create new jobs, and invest in our future. That's why we need to re-start the flow of credit and restore the rules of the road that will ensure a crisis like this never happens again.
That work begins with this plan – a plan I am confident will save or create at least three million jobs over the next few years. It is not just another public works program. It's a plan that recognizes both the paradox and the promise of this moment – the fact that there are millions of Americans trying to find work, even as, all around the country, there is so much work to be done. That's why we'll invest in priorities like energy and education; health care and a new infrastructure that are necessary to keep us strong and competitive in the 21st century. That's why the overwhelming majority of the jobs created will be in the private sector, while our plan will save the public sector jobs of teachers, cops, firefighters and others who provide vital services.
***
I understand that some might be skeptical of this plan. Our government has already spent a good deal of money, but we haven't yet seen that translate into more jobs or higher incomes or renewed confidence in our economy. That's why the American Recovery and Reinvestment Plan won't just throw money at our problems – we'll invest in what works. The true test of the policies we'll pursue won't be whether they're Democratic or Republican ideas, but whether they create jobs, grow our economy, and put the American Dream within reach of the American people.
Instead of politicians doling out money behind a veil of secrecy, decisions about where we invest will be made transparently, and informed by independent experts wherever possible. Every American will be able to hold Washington accountable for these decisions by going online to see how and where their tax dollars are being spent. And as I announced yesterday, we will launch an unprecedented effort to eliminate unwise and unnecessary spending that has never been more unaffordable for our nation and our children's future than it is right now.
***
Now, this recovery plan alone will not solve all the problems that led us into this crisis. We must also work with the same sense of urgency to stabilize and repair the financial system we all depend on. That means using our full arsenal of tools to get credit flowing again to families and business, while restoring confidence in our markets. It means launching a sweeping effort to address the foreclosure crisis so that we can keep responsible families in their homes. It means preventing the catastrophic failure of financial institutions whose collapse could endanger the entire economy, but only with maximum protections for taxpayers and a clear understanding that government support for any company is an extraordinary action that must come with significant restrictions on the firms that receive support. And it means reforming a weak and outdated regulatory system so that we can better withstand financial shocks and better protect consumers, investors, and businesses from the reckless greed and risk-taking that must never endanger our prosperity again.
No longer can we allow Wall Street wrongdoers to slip through regulatory cracks. No longer can we allow special interests to put their thumbs on the economic scales. No longer can we allow the unscrupulous lending and borrowing that leads only to destructive cycles of bubble and bust.
It is time to set a new course for this economy, and that change must begin now. We should have an open and honest discussion about this recovery plan in the days ahead, but I urge Congress to move as quickly as possible on behalf of the American people. For every day we wait or point fingers or drag our feet, more Americans will lose their jobs. More families will lose their savings. More dreams will be deferred and denied. And our nation will sink deeper into a crisis that, at some point, we may not be able to reverse.
-
Obama today is expected to give a “major” speech on the economy this afternoon at George Mason University
_
Isn't GMU one of the most wingnutty of schools? Is this Obama doing his "Daniel in the Lion's Den" schtick (something he doesn't pull off very well), or forshadowing that Obama's "economic stimulus" will be based on the failed assumptions that still constitute conventional wisdom among the Village elite? -
JNS-- I detected a little exasperation in your post about Obama giving an economic speech. What you call the eternal campaign is what I thought was the bully pulpit. Are you suggesting that Obama shouldn't be communicating with the country to inform them about his plans, trying to boost confidence about the future or assuming the public wants to participate in the process?
-
Sorry Plukasiak but plenty of regular people go to GMU. In fact, when you think of all the really exclusive and super expensive universities in the DC area he could have chosen, this is a school where regular working class kids can afford to attend.
-
"plukasiak Says: Isn't GMU one of the most wingnutty of schools?"
Huh? Are you serious? GMU is a Virginia State School with about 35,000 students. I live in Northern Virginia and GMU seems pretty standard large state university to me. Also, good basketball team - maybe why Obama chose it?
-
JNS wrote: “This was a Dems-only process,” one Senate GOP aide told me."
.
Where's your reporter's skepticism JNS about anything the GOP says? You didn't leave it on the hills of Morningside Heights did you? -
Jay - isn't the economic speech this morning - 11:00 am EST? I thought the afternoon speech is to introduce Tim Kaine as head of the DNC.
-
From First Read:
"Obama today will do what he might do best -- deliver a major address. Today's speech, which he'll give at 11:00 am ET at George Mason University in Northern Virginia
.....
After delivering his speech on the stimulus today, Obama will head to Democratic National Committee to hold a press conference with the man he has selected to lead his party, Virginia Gov. Tim Kaine."http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2009/01/08/1736885.aspx#comments
-
I really don't see a way out of double digit unemployment and I can't really agree with any plan that thinks this is an attainable goal. We need to purge the system of the bad debt not increase it with money we do not posses. Unemployment doesn't start to rise until well after the economy starts to recover, I can't help but think this is just continuing to impoverish future generations so that today's mistakes can continue.
-
What's interesting us that we seem to grasp the idea of leaving our children with mountains of debt but don't seem to think it's a problem leaving them with an infrastructure that's falling behind the rest of the developed world.
-
Note to self: If commenters like Kristiia can do news gathering and reporting, why choose a major newsweekly blog site for news? Oh...because people like Kristiia are here. Thanks Kristiia
-
Philippe: It is better to do something and fail, than do nothing and hope for improvement by divine intervention. By your reckoning, the recovery must have already begun because of the jobs losses incurred over the last three months.
-
JNS wrote: “This was a Dems-only process,” one Senate GOP aide told me."
.
Thanks JNS for including the Repub whine. This will likely be such a constant theme in years to come you may want to devise a macro for it. Of course this is from the group that would hold committee meetings without telling the minority when they were going to be held, etc. Not to mention obstruction, obstruction for the last two years. -
So its better to increase the debt load on our children through feel good policies by spending more money we do not have (which is why we are in this problem in the first place) rather then letting the people that have made the worst of the financial mistakes go bankrupt? I realize that many people are not fully responsible for their own financial woes but continuing to increase the height of the fall with these kinds of policies is not helping.
-
Thanks, Andy from MA.
I love our "Series of Tubes" that lets us post our own corrections instead of just yelling at our TVs or newspapers (or flinging our slippers).
Jay may be in transit so she can't correct it although I would hope she has one of those newfangled Crackberries that Obama is fighting to keep. I hope he wins that battle. He should make a Charlton Heston "From My Cold Dead Hands" statement about his Blackberry. http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=show_mesg&forum=132&topic_id=8068536&mesg_id=8068536
Never Surrender!!!
-
Feel good policies? Like the bridge I'm driving over isn't likely to collapse from decades of "deferred" maintenance. It would feel good knowing the that nation's infrastructure doesn't continue to go to hell in a handbasket. That's a investment; not a feel good policy, Philippe. I'm with Dee above on this. Let's end some of our dependence on defense spending, or bring troops home from Iraq if you want to be fiscally responsible.
.
It is evident to all who want to see that you won't find dramatic or substantive change in our Congress anytime soon. While spending programs appear to continue to enable these, these slugs in Congress, at least some of the money will be spent in the right places on the right programs.
.
As for burdening your kids with the debt, thank Mr. Bush and republican rule for the last 8 years, my friend! They put the burden on your kids. -
Obama may be talking to Republicans in person but those staffers who worked through the Holidays were, I'm told, all Democrats. “This was a Dems-only process,” one Senate GOP aide told me.
Do we need to remind everyone that it was the Republican philosopy and specific choices that got us into this mess in the first place? Of course Republicans will participate insofar as they represent many of the States and regions that will be needing money but whining about having insufficient authorship of the stimulus package is just that - whining.
-
Personally I like the idea of spending money on things like bridges, roads, schools and medical equipment. We all know they will spend the money regardless. So why not spend it on something we the plebians will actually get the most use out of?
-
Park Dirks and ivb3016: I don't why they need to whine, all the GOP has to do is threaten a filibuster and the Dems roll over. Anyone expect this behavior to change give 'em heck Harry Reid?
-
I really don't care whose responsible for the debt, I'll grant you that the fiscal policies implemented by the Bush years have been disastrous. What I'm saying is that creating new debt will not solve the problem. If the Obama plan actually reduced defense spending to offset the costs of his new programs, I would be all for that. I'm just terrified that this will be new debt and not paid for with existing funds. That is the problem with his proposal, creating more debt at this point only increases the fall we will have to face. The federal revenue is currently about 2.4 trillion dollars we are currently over budget by about 600 billion dollars, this plan is adding an extra 650 billion dollars to this so we will be about 1.2 trillion dollars more to the deficit. How far into the future do you want to increase taxes by 50% or more to account for this deficit? The military budget for 2009 is about 515 billion dollars. If we eliminated it completely this would not even account for the problems we have currently let alone this new plan.
Adding new debt is not the solution to this problem, we have to rethink how we are spending our money and drastically curb our consumerist habits. The entire lifestyle we are currently having is unsustainable.
-
Philippe: I respectfully choose to agree to disagree with you.
-
What about at some point when this financial crisis abates raising taxes to pay down the debt? Of course that can never ever be done.
-
Philippe-- Is it really that hard to distinguish between emergency measures and long term strategies. At this moment in time we have to deficit spend because we failed to make the long term investments we needed over the last thirty years. Once we lay the ground work for a 21st century economy we need going forward, then we can focus in long term fiscal responsibility. But clearly it's absurd to focus on a long term healthy life style while we are on the table bleeding. I know there is no shortage of stupidity in America, but surely we aren't too dumb to put pressure on our wounds and stop bleeding to death before we turn to weight loss.
-
"one Senate GOP aide told me" - you do know that's the initial maneuvering in a game to scuttle the plan, right?
-
re infrastructure: It's pretty obvious the United States is stuck in about 1960, while the rest of the 1st world develops high-speed trains and universal broadband coverage. -
philippe,
.
While I'm well aware of the arguments that suggest that increasing our debt is counterproductive, enough people I trust and who's opinion I respect more than my own assure me that such misgivings are unfounded. The government should never spend more than it takes in except at times like these. The number of essential functions that have been bled dry and the degree to which actual consumer and business behavior is predicated on the perception of safety vs risk, suggests that government spending at this juncture actually represents an investment, not a burden.
.
This isn't always the case, but it is today. -
If you have gangrene spreading up your left arm do you operate to slow the spread of the disease so that it takes longer to reach your heart and kill you or do you take off the arm and take the pain? I really would like Obama to focus on infrastructure and health care, but if he does so he HAS to cut other programs to do it. If he does it by inuring more debt we are just that more likely to get the financial collapse we are so nervously trying to avoid. The problem is that creating unemployment and bankruptcy are political suicide even though that is what the economy needs right now. We need to get rid of all the bad debt we have accumulated over the last 20 years of growth.
Most Popular »
- A Final Palin Post
- He Had a First Name. It Was O-S-C-A-R.
- Palin's Super Powers Explained
- Swampland Has A New Look!
- Baby Hand-Me-Downs Are Suddenly Trendy
- One Last Big (Yet Moving) Show for Michael
- Here's A Test
- Health Care: Back to the Drawing Board
- All ready to sign up for John Meriwether's next fund?
- The Crowds In Ghana
- Why Are Southerners So Fat?
- What Does Life-Extending Drug Mean for Humans?
- The Outsider: Where Is Sarah Palin Going Next?
- Oh Crap! My Parents Joined Facebook
- Florida Wrestles with Its Python Problem
- Obama: Getting Down to the Hard Choices
- After California: Which States Are in the Most Peril?
- Google's Chrome: Taking Aim at Microsoft - and the iPhone
- Yes, I Suck: Self-Help Through Negative Thinking
- Advice from an Economist Who Saw 1929











RSS