<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Panetta on Torture</title>
	<atom:link href="http://swampland.blogs.time.com/2009/01/05/leon-panetta-for-cia-post/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://swampland.blogs.time.com/2009/01/05/leon-panetta-for-cia-post/</link>
	<description>A blog about politics.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 09 Dec 2009 07:50:49 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: pourmecoffee</title>
		<link>http://swampland.blogs.time.com/2009/01/05/leon-panetta-for-cia-post/comment-page-1/#comment-32040</link>
		<dc:creator>pourmecoffee</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Jan 2009 13:20:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://swampland.blogs.time.com/?p=9409#comment-32040</guid>
		<description>Not consulting, or even informing, Feinstein was an unforced tactical error unrelated to the appropriate disdain for her previous positions. It&#039;s also a little unsettling to scrape and bow to Republicans in the &quot;spirit of bipartisanship&quot; while we ramrod our own. Lesson learned. Panetta a good choice. Next.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Not consulting, or even informing, Feinstein was an unforced tactical error unrelated to the appropriate disdain for her previous positions. It's also a little unsettling to scrape and bow to Republicans in the "spirit of bipartisanship" while we ramrod our own. Lesson learned. Panetta a good choice. Next.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Casey Morris</title>
		<link>http://swampland.blogs.time.com/2009/01/05/leon-panetta-for-cia-post/comment-page-1/#comment-32036</link>
		<dc:creator>Casey Morris</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Jan 2009 12:40:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://swampland.blogs.time.com/?p=9409#comment-32036</guid>
		<description>This isn&#039;t about DiFi and JayRock not liking Panetta. This is about them not being consulted.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This isn't about DiFi and JayRock not liking Panetta. This is about them not being consulted.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Casey Morris</title>
		<link>http://swampland.blogs.time.com/2009/01/05/leon-panetta-for-cia-post/comment-page-1/#comment-32035</link>
		<dc:creator>Casey Morris</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Jan 2009 12:39:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://swampland.blogs.time.com/?p=9409#comment-32035</guid>
		<description>They want someone with more intelligence experience.
_
I want someone with more intelligence.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>They want someone with more intelligence experience.<br />
_<br />
I want someone with more intelligence.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: sqr1</title>
		<link>http://swampland.blogs.time.com/2009/01/05/leon-panetta-for-cia-post/comment-page-1/#comment-32022</link>
		<dc:creator>sqr1</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Jan 2009 05:04:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://swampland.blogs.time.com/?p=9409#comment-32022</guid>
		<description>Glenn, et al. have covered why DiFi&#039;s objection should be Panetta&#039;s stamp of approval.
.
Beyond that, I must admit that I really don&#039;t understand the Bush Dogs in Congress.
.
I mean, I get Bush and Cheney.  I get the Republicans in Congress.  I don&#039;t agree with any of them, mind you.  But I understand where they are coming from, what they want, and why they act the way they do.  But the DiFis and the Rockefellers, not to mention the Reids and Pelosis, always remain a mystery to me.  I don&#039;t understand their motivation.  For 8 years they rolled over for the Bush White House.  They handed over total control of the intelligence apparatus to Cheney and not only failed to make a peep, but cheered on Congress&#039; diminishing oversight role.  NOW they get their panties in a bunch over Panetta?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Glenn, et al. have covered why DiFi's objection should be Panetta's stamp of approval.<br />
.<br />
Beyond that, I must admit that I really don't understand the Bush Dogs in Congress.<br />
.<br />
I mean, I get Bush and Cheney.  I get the Republicans in Congress.  I don't agree with any of them, mind you.  But I understand where they are coming from, what they want, and why they act the way they do.  But the DiFis and the Rockefellers, not to mention the Reids and Pelosis, always remain a mystery to me.  I don't understand their motivation.  For 8 years they rolled over for the Bush White House.  They handed over total control of the intelligence apparatus to Cheney and not only failed to make a peep, but cheered on Congress' diminishing oversight role.  NOW they get their panties in a bunch over Panetta?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: formerlyjames</title>
		<link>http://swampland.blogs.time.com/2009/01/05/leon-panetta-for-cia-post/comment-page-1/#comment-32017</link>
		<dc:creator>formerlyjames</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Jan 2009 02:55:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://swampland.blogs.time.com/?p=9409#comment-32017</guid>
		<description>Is Darth Vader available?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Is Darth Vader available?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: hopefulemoticon</title>
		<link>http://swampland.blogs.time.com/2009/01/05/leon-panetta-for-cia-post/comment-page-1/#comment-32015</link>
		<dc:creator>hopefulemoticon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Jan 2009 02:40:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://swampland.blogs.time.com/?p=9409#comment-32015</guid>
		<description>How &#039;bout McCain as CIA director?  They&#039;re definitely in sync on torture.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>How 'bout McCain as CIA director?  They're definitely in sync on torture.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: formerlyjames</title>
		<link>http://swampland.blogs.time.com/2009/01/05/leon-panetta-for-cia-post/comment-page-1/#comment-32005</link>
		<dc:creator>formerlyjames</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Jan 2009 01:56:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://swampland.blogs.time.com/?p=9409#comment-32005</guid>
		<description>bethva, hell hath no fury as a woman scorned.  Does Rockefeller wear panties too?  OK, forgive me. I am not sexist, just clumsily trying to be funny.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>bethva, hell hath no fury as a woman scorned.  Does Rockefeller wear panties too?  OK, forgive me. I am not sexist, just clumsily trying to be funny.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: bethnva</title>
		<link>http://swampland.blogs.time.com/2009/01/05/leon-panetta-for-cia-post/comment-page-1/#comment-32002</link>
		<dc:creator>bethnva</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Jan 2009 01:39:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://swampland.blogs.time.com/?p=9409#comment-32002</guid>
		<description>Here&#039;s what Glenn &quot;Glennzilla&quot; Greenwald says about Dianne Feinstein:

&lt;em&gt;UPDATE VI:  Spencer Ackerman reports that Sen. Dianne Feinstein is upset with the selection of Panetta, petulantly complaining that she wasn&#039;t consulted in advance and that it would be best to have an &quot;intelligence professional&quot; in that position.  CQ&#039;s Tim Starks reports that Sen. Jay Rockefeller is making very similar noises about this selection.  Few things could reflect better on Panetta&#039;s selection than the fact that Feinstein and Rockefeller -- two of the most Bush-enabling Senators -- are unhappy with it.&lt;/em&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Here's what Glenn "Glennzilla" Greenwald says about Dianne Feinstein:</p>
<p><em>UPDATE VI:  Spencer Ackerman reports that Sen. Dianne Feinstein is upset with the selection of Panetta, petulantly complaining that she wasn't consulted in advance and that it would be best to have an "intelligence professional" in that position.  CQ's Tim Starks reports that Sen. Jay Rockefeller is making very similar noises about this selection.  Few things could reflect better on Panetta's selection than the fact that Feinstein and Rockefeller -- two of the most Bush-enabling Senators -- are unhappy with it.</em></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: toham</title>
		<link>http://swampland.blogs.time.com/2009/01/05/leon-panetta-for-cia-post/comment-page-1/#comment-31996</link>
		<dc:creator>toham</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Jan 2009 01:13:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://swampland.blogs.time.com/?p=9409#comment-31996</guid>
		<description>They want someone with more intelligence experience and more neocon world view ... like them!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>They want someone with more intelligence experience and more neocon world view ... like them!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: formerlyjames</title>
		<link>http://swampland.blogs.time.com/2009/01/05/leon-panetta-for-cia-post/comment-page-1/#comment-31995</link>
		<dc:creator>formerlyjames</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Jan 2009 01:11:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://swampland.blogs.time.com/?p=9409#comment-31995</guid>
		<description>Panetta, sorry general.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Panetta, sorry general.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
