A blog about politics.

Death of the Regional Newspaper Bureau in Washington

Over the years that I have been in Washington, many of the finest, most sophisticated and most dogged journalists I have known have been reporters in small newspaper bureaus, who have seen it as their mission to make sure that the politicians elected to represent their readers back home stay honest. This story by Jennifer Dorroh in AJR points to a trend in our business that should worry everyone:

"These days, all the major bureaus have space they're renting out. We've all become landlords looking for subtenants," says Condon, who was bureau chief when he accepted a buyout from the company, which closed the bureau after the presidential election.

"The real tragedy is that as more newspapers cut back, you're not going to have anybody watching the congressional delegation," he says. "In our case, we're sure that there's a certain former congressman who's sitting in prison in Arizona who has got to be saying to himself, 'Why didn't Copley do this two years ago?' Because he'd still be in Congress and he'd still be drawing millions in bribes." (See Drop Cap, April/May 2006.)

"Nobody else would've gotten Duke Cunningham. USA Today, AP, New York Times, none of them would devote resources to a backbench, local San Diego congressman in that kind of detail," he says. "It has to be the local paper."

As newspapers grapple with the ever-growing pressure to cut costs, more and more of them come to view Washington bureaus as luxuries they simply cannot afford. During the last three years, newspapers – including those in San Diego, Orlando, Los Angeles, Toledo, San Francisco, Des Moines, Pittsburgh, Denver, Newark and St. Louis – have eliminated more than 40 Washington regional reporter positions through layoffs, buyouts or attrition. These were journalists who followed not the splashy national stories but their readers' parochial interests in Washington. In November alone, Copley and Newhouse News Service shuttered their Washington bureaus, and Small Newspapers eliminated the position of Edward Felker, its lone Washington reporter, who covered six senators and seven House members from Minnesota, Illinois and Iowa.

  • Print
  • Comment
Comments (86)
Post a Comment »
  • 26

    jay
    .
    You have to tie my post upthread together with that one.
    .
    The only thing i can think of is if every traditional newspaper banded together to either take the papers offline OR charge for online subscriptions.
    .
    The only way it works is if ALL newspapers do it. Otherwise people will just go to a different paper's site and get their info. But if they COULD all get together then it WOULD work because people would have to get their news from somewhere and 12 dollars a year would seem like a steal. Bigger than that the bloggers could then charge for their blogs also especially a blog like huffpo that utilizes tons of different newssources. It would be one stop shoping for 2 dollars a month. Mo money Mo money Mo money Mo!

  • 27

    Now optimally this should have happened initially before anybody ever had a taste of free access to newspapers but if they change course now there will be some grumbling but quite a few people will still pay 12 bucks a year for access.
    .
    Sorry, but that ship has sailed. And there's good research that shows that the consumer mindset of online news being "inferior" (in an economic sense, meaning that consumers expect it to be free and will not pay for it) is pretty much set in stone.
    .

  • 29

    jay
    .
    yes a newspaper cartel is what I am saying. Not advocating mind you but saying its the only thing that would work

  • 30

    James--
    .
    it seems to me this is tied directly to these companies going public. They have to make Wall Street margins, and the enterprise, if done properly, can't do that. Without a beneficient master willing to accept single digit margins, it's not sustainable. There really is no bottom line way to justify a Washington beat reporter for the Topeka Capitol=Journal. Or the Anchorage Daily News, which we have discovered to be a fine newspaper.

  • 31

    jayackroyd:
    .
    I understand. My point is that the impact of teevee should be discussed because it has a serious impact on the profitability of print journalism.
    .
    The late Neil Postman noted that the very medium of television is inherently ill-suited to providing information in an intelligent manner. Whether that is absolutely true may be up for debate. But it seems to be the mission of most cable news producers to prove Postman right.
    .
    If the message to Americans from print journalists was "That stuff you get on your TV? That's not journalism." then I believe more Americans would make the effort to consume print journalism.
    .
    For all the failings of Fox News in terms of bias and advocating a political agenda, what is perhaps even worse is that they simply practice terrible, terrible, terrible journalism.

  • 32

    Does anybody know what the newspaper business is doing like in Europe?
    I am biased of course, but I think the he said/she said model is doomed to failure.
    .
    The most engaged citizens tend to be liberal or conservative. Offering people a sprinkle of this and that, and making everything a balanced mush is not going to target the people interested in news.
    .
    Tis why I don't understand how that D.C. and Northern Virginia can be so strongly democratic yet we get The Moonie Times and to compete with that we get Fred Hiatt over at the Post with Debbie Howell screaming over his shoulder that his paper is too liberal. It boggles my mind.

  • 33

    KT
    .
    But its not just newspapers, its also magazines that are getting hit some which I don't have to tell you. Thats why making people subscribe online, to me is the only answer for print media. But it would take a helluva effort of cooperation between competitors

  • 35

    fourlegsgood
    .
    Ok then explain to me what will happen if every print news source switched to pay to play tomorrow. Where would all the people seeking news go? Seriously I am all ears

  • 36

    In the old days, if you were selling your kids' swingset or looking for a job, you went to the classifieds.
    .
    I did say this. This is the heart of the local paper's business problem. I think what may happen is more papers going weekly. that's the small market model now. My hometown paper is a weekly, in what was then rural and is now suburban Maine. Not the Portland paper, that everybody also gets.
    .
    And really being local. High school sports. A very big deal. There will still be a market for that coverage.

  • 37

    What about a bbc model? pbs but for papers.

  • 38

    jayack.
    yes, but you run the risk of the nightmare that LA Times is facing with Sam Zell "I haven't figured out how to cash in a Pulitzer Prize" Zell has been one huge disaster after Tribune ruined the whole paper first. I hope the paper survives. One of the finest in the nation, until Tribune bought it.

  • 39

    I used to love me my LA Times. I subscribed when I was a teen still.
    Great metro and sports sections too. Their Calendar section for entertainment was also top notch. I think the Times gos short shrift in prestige compared to the Post and the NY Times.

  • 40

    Ok then explain to me what will happen if every print news source switched to pay to play tomorrow. Where would all the people seeking news go? Seriously I am all ears

    Content would be bootlegged in a heartbeat.

  • 41

    trifecta--
    .
    Yeah, that's another model that worked here in the past. Dump the whole "balance" and "professional journalism" business and go back to advocacy. But, again, I think that means a reversion to a privately held, not joint stock corporation, model. Like the NY Post. Murdoch is perfectly happy losing money on that. Fox, FTM.

  • 42

    sgw-
    .
    In the first place, this would be illegal.
    .
    In the second place, cartels are not sustainable. the benefits to defecting are too great.

  • 43

    pbs runs ads trifecta.

  • 44

    I don't like GE and Disney running news organizations. I am prissy I guess. I like the wealthy bored benefactor model. There are too many problems of conflicts when companies have so many fingers in so many pots. I don't want ABC covering congress when congress is debating extending the copyright for Mickey Mouse. I don't want GE run NBC covering a war when they are involved in defense subcontracting.
    The same applies to papers of course.
    .
    It would just be easier to break up television monopolies than of course with print because of the FCC.

  • 45

    fourleggs
    .
    Here is what I feel you are missing about that. WHO CARES if it gets boolegged? If the newspaper orgs get a dollar off its online component its a dollar more than what they are getting right now. Unless the bootleggers can find a way to hack the paper's website in a way that gives them free access, the newspaper will get revenue that they are not getting now.

  • 46

    Also, part of the issue for newspapers (in selling online advertising) is that the advertisers don't really understand what they're buying. (this is what I hear from my friends in that side of the business)

  • 47

    They didn't used to run ads Jay. I think beefed up local pbs outlets with web presences could be an interesting model. As part of their charter, make them cover local news, report on the local congress critters.

  • 48

    "It was NOT the Washington bureau of Copley who discovered Cunningham's crimes. Copley in Washington apparently missed the crimes massively corrupt Congressman had been doing FOR YEARS, right under the nose of DC journalism, including the Copley bureau in Washington."
    .
    I don't think this can be emphasized enough. It doesn't matter how many people you employ if you choose to ignore relevant stories.
    .
    Journalism isn't technically a profession. But, like the practice of medicine or law, it isn't always going to be profitable. And yet it still needs to get done. But as long as the practitioners peddle garbage that is profitable, there is no incentive to take the financial hits necessary to do the right thing.

  • 49

    KT - A big chunk of the problem with newspapers and magazines is unrelated to editorial talent; it's the cost of print production, home delivery, and the inefficiencies of advertising purchasing and distribution. What newspapers need right now has little to do with anything on the editorial side: they need smart publishers who can push through these tough times and emerge on the other side having captured regional advertising revenue for the online side and a plan to migrate in that direction. This is about cleaning up the balance sheet, not the front page.

  • 50

    Here is what I feel you are missing about that. WHO CARES if it gets boolegged?

    Look, I don't want to argue with you - but someone will ALWAYS find a way to get around a pay model. The horse has left the barn. Newspapers will have to find another business model.

Add Your Comment:

You must be logged in to post a comment.
Swampland Daily E-mail

Get e-mail updates from TIME's Swampland in your inbox and never miss a day.

Quotes of the Day »

Get & Share
JAMIE O'BRIEN, a competitor in the Eddie Aikau surfing competition in Oahu, Hawaii, on surfing the rare 40-foot waves that hit the island this week