A blog about politics.

Mitt Romney For Auto Industry Czar*

If I were a candidate for public office, I would not turn to Mitt Romney for advice. If I were building a million-dollar country mansion, I would not make Romney my interior decorator. If I needed jokes for a standup act, Romney would not be my writer. But if I lived in a nation threatened by a automobile industry collapse, Romney would be at the top of the list of experts whose advice I heeded. The reason: Everything in his life has prepared him for this task.

To understand Romney, one must understand that his entire professional career has been an homage to his father, a successful automobile executive who helped turn around Detroit during another period of financial peril. Romney learned, quite literally, at his father's knee, and then spent his adult life replicating, and outdoing, his father's success in the business world. Romney's record as a corporate financier is one of a disciplined, sometimes ruthless, and determined son. Romney became rich because he had a smarter business mind and a fiercer work ethic than the other guys. (Too bad for him, hard work and smarts are just two of the many requirements for a candidate for president.)

In today's New York Times, Romney writes an op-ed called "Let Detroit Go Bankrupt." He proposes firing the management of the big three, rejecting the short-term bailout now on the table, and forcing the American automakers to deal with their substantial pension and labor disadvantages, when compared with foreign automakers. His thesis:

If General Motors, Ford and Chrysler get the bailout that their chief executives asked for yesterday, you can kiss the American automotive industry goodbye. It won't go overnight, but its demise will be virtually guaranteed. Without that bailout, Detroit will need to drastically restructure itself. With it, the automakers will stay the course — the suicidal course of declining market shares, insurmountable labor and retiree burdens, technology atrophy, product inferiority and never-ending job losses. Detroit needs a turnaround, not a check.

His solution:

[D]on't ask Washington to give shareholders and bondholders a free pass — they bet on management and they lost. The American auto industry is vital to our national interest as an employer and as a hub for manufacturing. A managed bankruptcy may be the only path to the fundamental restructuring the industry needs. It would permit the companies to shed excess labor, pension and real estate costs. The federal government should provide guarantees for post-bankruptcy financing and assure car buyers that their warranties are not at risk.

There is, of course, a great irony to this sort of op-ed. It was Romney, after all, who won the Michigan primary by attacking John McCain for telling voters that some manufacturing jobs "are not coming back." Romney the Politician always seemed to be pandering to one group or another. It was hard to believe him after a while. But Romney the Businessman is another thing altogether. The same thing that made him a lousy candidate--an obsession with seeing everything as a Harvard Business School case study--makes him the kind of person you want to listen to in a corporate financial crisis.

*The headline is a joke. I am not in the business of making personnel recommendations to Barack Obama. Though I can't help thinking about what a stir Obama would make if he did something like that.

UPDATE: Another argument in favor of bankruptcy can be found here, by the Times' Andrew Ross Sorkin.

ANOTHER: Commenter Pourmecoffee notes properly that it is unfair to just blame unions for the mess. Corporate management must own it too. (They can begin by contemplating the wisdom of their private jets.) Also Matt Yglesias has some good historical perspective on the Big 3 union dilemma. And the argument that management matters is further proved by TIME's report from Bill Saporito on the relative health of Ford to General Motors, despite similar union arrangements.

  • Print
  • Comment
Comments (116)
Post a Comment »
  • 1

    Well, hvell the who gives a steaming bowl of excreta about the jobs that will be lost, eh?

  • 2

    Why don't we just let it all go down the hole, and let the Gods of The Free Market handle it?
    .
    Ahyuh! Ahyuh! Ahyuh!

  • 3

    Yes! Principals* over reality!
    .
    That'll win the GOP votes come 2010...
    .
    .
    *Ideology

  • 4

    Michael,

    Do you even know how Mittens made his money? Meet the real life Gordon Geckko.
    .
    Romney made his fortune by coldbloodedly gambling on the successes and failures of the companies he bought and sold. Romney could care less about labor he only cares about turning money into money and more than a few of his investments were of the scorched-earth variety, buying up companies and cashing out within three to five years, often after closing factories or laying off workers to beef up the bottom line.
    .
    How does his style and experience help the big 3?

  • 5

    GOP take on the manufacturing sector:
    .
    It's all going away anyway, so fvck it!

  • 6

    All right, I can understand what Romney is saying here. And if we weren't already teetering on the brink, I'd agree with him.
    .
    But we are teetering on the brink, and I don't understand why we can't bail them out with conditions attached.
    .
    Now I know that violates Romney's Three Laws of Business, and I know that Paulson prefers to hand over wheelbarrows of cash with no oversight.
    But in theory, it seems like we could bail them out under the condition that they reinvent themselves.

  • 7

    So let Romney the Businessman run an automobile business.
    But I don't take it on faith that his business experience qualifies him to run the economy, or regulate an industry. A good student does not necessarily make a good teacher, and a good player does not necessarily make a good coach.
    Romney's advice may be good for automobile executives, but it doesn't follow that it's good advice for the government.

  • 8

    It's like Scherer doesn't realize there are other people besides the High Rollers that participate in this economy.
    .
    Micheal Scherer looks at the world through a gaily painted toilet paper tube!

  • 9

    I've been a bit nippy here, but what the hvell!
    .
    Here goes another!
    .
    "Globalization is inevitable! You will not escape!" He bellowed, firmly clamping the two unfortunates under each of his rubbery armpits as he proceeded toward the airloack.
    .
    "Globalization is inevitable!"

  • 10

    This is really dumb.

  • 11

    Shouldn't that be, "If I were"?

    Just sayin'.

  • 12

    "(Too bad for him, hard work and smarts are just two of the many requirements for a candidate for president.)"
    .
    Irony?

  • 14

    Romney's Three Laws of Business
    .
    1. Garf 'em down
    2. Git what I want
    2-1/2. fvck everything else
    3. Splatter fort what's left

  • 15

    MICHAEL WROTE: Romney learned, quite literally, at his father's knee
    .
    That Mr. Romney Senior must have been a tall, tall man.

  • 16

    Let's keep Mit away from the auto industry and Michael away from offering advice to Obama's transition team and the country just might survive this current melt down.

  • 17

    53-
    Do you think Mittens is more Vogon or Golgafrincham?

  • 18

    "That Mr. Romney Senior must have been a tall, tall man."
    .
    Maybe he was Paul Bunyan.
    .
    And his Blue Ox was... drumroll, whether you like it or not!
    .
    Micheal Scherer!

  • 19

    I think Vogon, definately. The Golgafrinchams were more wishy washy. Vogons were relentlessly loyal to their ideals...

  • 20

    It would permit the companies to shed excess labor, pension and real estate costs.

    In other words, it would make sure that the people who really get screwed are the workers, current and retired.
    .
    And of course, the people who decided that if the public wants SUV's then by God we'll make sure we can't provide anything BUT, collect their Golden Parachutes in a lump sum, so they can go ahead and put the someplace safe instead.

  • 21

    Chrysler is currently owned by Cerberus Capital Management - a firm full of Mitt Romney clones with identical pedigrees except for the bloodline. They all want the same thing: a mulligan on wage, pension, and union commitments. Meanwhile, southern politicians wait silently like vultures for the plants to close and rise again in their right-to-work states, whether as GM or Toyota - it matters little to them. Mitt Romney would make the worst Auto Czar in the world, because he approaches the issue as a stereotypical private equity play, which is to say solely from a profitability standpoint. He has demonstrated little concern for the messy realities of rust belt manufacturing workers and cities, except to pander thoughtlessly while shaking their greasy hands pending a more thoughtful column for the country club crowd. Mitt Romney cares about one thing above all else: capital formation and flow. That is Mitt Romney.

  • 22

    It's true. Mittens is looking at the auto business as a financier, not as an industrialist. There is a difference.
    .
    I would also take issue with your characterization, thus:
    "Romney became rich because he had a smarter business mind and a fiercer work ethic than the other guys."
    Uhmmm, not really. Scherer makes a rather dumb equivalency, money as measure of achievement. Only if you think a 30 y.o. hedge fund manager is somehow more accomplished and worthy than the President of the United States.

  • 23

    Didn't Micheal Scherer realize that there is a lot of this here "excess labor" these days?
    .
    I mean, doh! Why in pluperfect hvell does he think we even have an economic meltdown?
    .
    Riddle me that, Micheal!

  • 24

    Cerberus Capital, Sirius Cybernetics -- it all makes sense now!
    To 53 & me, anyway...

  • 25

    Everyone should read Matt Taibbi's Rolling Stone Article on Mittens. If it doesn't prove what an insane idea of letting near the big 3 is then nothing will. Here are some highlights.
    .
    Harvard-educated prodigy executive, Romney at a very young age was put in charge of a venture-capital outfit called Bain Capital. Reports suggest that many of the traits that mark Romney's campaign style - his meticulously prepared presentation, his apparent tirelessness, his iron discipline in not straying into controversial or unpredictable policy positions - were also in evidence in his managerial style at Bain, where he is said to have pored over each and every expenditure and bloodlessly weeded out risky investment schemes in an age (the early Eighties) when many investment companies were spending money like drunken sailors. At Bain, each partner had veto power over every deal, and as a result, investing any money at all was an enormously time-consuming process. One former partner, Bob White, says he got so tired of Romney shooting down deals in strategy meetings that he wanted to "punch him in the nose." But the devil's-advocate approach paid off - most notably when Bain's $650,000 investment in a single Staples store turned into an $18 billion chain.
    .
    Despite this success, however, Romney moved Bain away from boom-bust venture-capital investments and into the darker world of leveraged buyouts, where the firm borrowed money to make deals. A typical example of Bain's approach was its experience with another office-supply company called Ampad, which it acquired in 1992. In 1993, the company had $11 million in debt; by 1999, that number had grown to nearly $400 million, and the firm eventually declared bankruptcy. But despite Ampad's failure, Bain made a fortune, raking in more than $100 million while driving the company into the ground and destroying hundreds of jobs in places like New York (where 185 people were thrown out of work in a plant closing near Buffalo) and Indiana (where the firm fired 200 workers from a paper factory).
    .
    Even more telling was Romney's interest in a medical-testing firm called Damon Corp., which Bain bought in 1989. The company was eventually fined a record $119 million for defrauding the federal government out of $25 million, but Bain still tripled its investment on the Damon deal. And Romney, who was sitting on the Damon board at the time of the fraud (his claim that he was the one who called for an internal investigation has never been substantiated), made a personal profit of $473,000 on the deal.
    .
    In a delicious detail that says a lot about the nature of Romney's morality, the investor had no problem making piles of cash off companies that executed mass layoffs or defrauded the government, but he balked when asked to invest in a Bain deal to acquire a video distribution company called Artisan Entertainment. "I didn't want to profit from a studio that made R-rated movies," he huffed
    .
    http://www.rollingstone.com/politics/story/16983679/mitt_romney_the_huckster/3

Add Your Comment:

You must be logged in to post a comment.
Swampland Daily E-mail

Get e-mail updates from TIME's Swampland in your inbox and never miss a day.