<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Moving Forward on Health Care</title>
	<atom:link href="http://swampland.blogs.time.com/2008/11/12/moving-forward-on-health-care/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://swampland.blogs.time.com/2008/11/12/moving-forward-on-health-care/</link>
	<description>A blog about politics.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 09 Dec 2009 00:12:57 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: The Call to Action for Health Care Reform in 2009: Responsive Critique Separating Fact from Fantasy &#124; Thomas A. Sharon, R.N., M.P.H.</title>
		<link>http://swampland.blogs.time.com/2008/11/12/moving-forward-on-health-care/comment-page-2/#comment-22641</link>
		<dc:creator>The Call to Action for Health Care Reform in 2009: Responsive Critique Separating Fact from Fantasy &#124; Thomas A. Sharon, R.N., M.P.H.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 20 Nov 2008 20:44:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://timeswampland.wordpress.com/?p=8165#comment-22641</guid>
		<description>[...] Moving Forward on Health Care [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Moving Forward on Health Care [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Obama’s Health Care Reform: What is wrong with our System? Los Angeles Trauma Surgeon Donald Trunkey, M.D. Makes Shocking Revelations &#124; Thomas A. Sharon, R.N., M.P.H.</title>
		<link>http://swampland.blogs.time.com/2008/11/12/moving-forward-on-health-care/comment-page-2/#comment-21205</link>
		<dc:creator>Obama’s Health Care Reform: What is wrong with our System? Los Angeles Trauma Surgeon Donald Trunkey, M.D. Makes Shocking Revelations &#124; Thomas A. Sharon, R.N., M.P.H.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 17 Nov 2008 23:56:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://timeswampland.wordpress.com/?p=8165#comment-21205</guid>
		<description>[...] Time [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Time [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: hag2</title>
		<link>http://swampland.blogs.time.com/2008/11/12/moving-forward-on-health-care/comment-page-2/#comment-20508</link>
		<dc:creator>hag2</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 15 Nov 2008 01:39:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://timeswampland.wordpress.com/?p=8165#comment-20508</guid>
		<description>The Call to Action/Health Care Reform 2009 proposal released 11/13/08
(http://www.finance.senate.gov/) by Senator Max Baucus is a disaster.  
The Baucus plan is an expansion and continuation of the status-quo
mixture of a government subsidized ineffective private health
maintenance insurance industry operating parallel to and within Medicare
Insurance.

7 Specific Reasons Why the Baucus Health Reform 2009 Plan Fails.....

1) The Baucus plan fails to enroll all Americans in a single payer
National Health Insurance such as the most efficient health insuranceplan (Medicare) which is already contracted with  most doctors, hospitals and clinics in the Country.  Medicare has the lowest operating expenses and the best morbidity (sickness rates) and mortality (death rates) compared to all other insurance companies.  The Baucus plan will therefore divert $700 Billion to $1 Trillion per year away from patients, hospitals, doctors, clinics, nurses, pharmaceuticals, therapist and researchers into the overhead pockets of health private insurance company administrators and executives.

2)  The Baucus plan fails to technologically upgrade, integrate and
centralize medical billing and records systems in order to optimize
examination of clinical outcomes, pharmaceutical efficacies and monitor fraud and abuse.  In addition, by failing to centralize and
technologically upgrade billing and records systems within a single
National Health Insurance plan, America will be unable to instantly
monitor disease outbreaks and instantly respond to natural and man made disasters or bio-nuclear terrorism..

3)  The Baucus plan fails to control drug costs by  failing to allow a single efficient national health  insurance company such as  Medicare to bid on pharmaceuticals.  In addition, the Baucus plan by failing to put all Americans on a National Health Insurance Plan such as Medicare  does little to shrink the &#039;risk pool&#039; of insured, thereby failing to decrease insurance premium expenses for all Americans.

4)  The Baucus plan fails to provide funding for scientific, clinical and epidemiological  research and development by allowing private private insurance companies to divert funds from medical research and development to instead support their massive and profitable administrative and executive bureaucratic overheads.

5)  The Baucus plan fails to provide physicians with the same legal
protection from malpractice lawsuits which have been established for
commercial health insurance corporations during the last 3 decades.

6) The Baucus plan fails to explain where to find the 1.5 million new health care workers which will be needed once 100 million new Americans obtain health care insurance. Health care workers can be found easily by shutting down the wasteful and inefficient private health insurance companies, putting all Americans on National Health Insurance such as Medicare.  The 1.5 million former private insurance company bureaucrats can then be remployed to actually deliver health care in hospitals,clinics, nursing homes, assisted living facilities, pharmacies and home
health services such as Alzheimer family assistance.

7)  The Baucus Plan fails to address this problem of disenfranchised
physicians.  Many physicians in this country have left the practice of medicine, or downsized their practices due to private insurance company abuses, malpractice threats and direct pharmaceutical marketing.  A recent national poll of physicians based on the AMA database demonstrated that 60% of physicians support a single payer National Health Insurance such as Medicare.  A continuation and technological upgrading of our most fair Medicare Health Insurance for all based on the concepts outlined above, would undoubtedly motivate those disenfranchised physicians to return to the profession and bright younger physicians to invigorate the field.

The Baucus plan  is wasteful, inefficient, fragmented, creates a new
redundant bureaucracy and will continue to provide no potential future health improvements for America.  Only an efficient National Health Insurance carrier such as a technologically upgraded Medicare Insurance  company will be able to provide low cost health insurance and pharmaceuticals  for all Americans while maintaining the quality of private physician practices and Hospitals.

H. Green, MD, FACP, FAAD, FACMS</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The Call to Action/Health Care Reform 2009 proposal released 11/13/08<br />
(<a href="http://www.finance.senate.gov/" rel="nofollow">http://www.finance.senate.gov/</a>) by Senator Max Baucus is a disaster.<br />
The Baucus plan is an expansion and continuation of the status-quo<br />
mixture of a government subsidized ineffective private health<br />
maintenance insurance industry operating parallel to and within Medicare<br />
Insurance.</p>
<p>7 Specific Reasons Why the Baucus Health Reform 2009 Plan Fails.....</p>
<p>1) The Baucus plan fails to enroll all Americans in a single payer<br />
National Health Insurance such as the most efficient health insuranceplan (Medicare) which is already contracted with  most doctors, hospitals and clinics in the Country.  Medicare has the lowest operating expenses and the best morbidity (sickness rates) and mortality (death rates) compared to all other insurance companies.  The Baucus plan will therefore divert $700 Billion to $1 Trillion per year away from patients, hospitals, doctors, clinics, nurses, pharmaceuticals, therapist and researchers into the overhead pockets of health private insurance company administrators and executives.</p>
<p>2)  The Baucus plan fails to technologically upgrade, integrate and<br />
centralize medical billing and records systems in order to optimize<br />
examination of clinical outcomes, pharmaceutical efficacies and monitor fraud and abuse.  In addition, by failing to centralize and<br />
technologically upgrade billing and records systems within a single<br />
National Health Insurance plan, America will be unable to instantly<br />
monitor disease outbreaks and instantly respond to natural and man made disasters or bio-nuclear terrorism..</p>
<p>3)  The Baucus plan fails to control drug costs by  failing to allow a single efficient national health  insurance company such as  Medicare to bid on pharmaceuticals.  In addition, the Baucus plan by failing to put all Americans on a National Health Insurance Plan such as Medicare  does little to shrink the 'risk pool' of insured, thereby failing to decrease insurance premium expenses for all Americans.</p>
<p>4)  The Baucus plan fails to provide funding for scientific, clinical and epidemiological  research and development by allowing private private insurance companies to divert funds from medical research and development to instead support their massive and profitable administrative and executive bureaucratic overheads.</p>
<p>5)  The Baucus plan fails to provide physicians with the same legal<br />
protection from malpractice lawsuits which have been established for<br />
commercial health insurance corporations during the last 3 decades.</p>
<p>6) The Baucus plan fails to explain where to find the 1.5 million new health care workers which will be needed once 100 million new Americans obtain health care insurance. Health care workers can be found easily by shutting down the wasteful and inefficient private health insurance companies, putting all Americans on National Health Insurance such as Medicare.  The 1.5 million former private insurance company bureaucrats can then be remployed to actually deliver health care in hospitals,clinics, nursing homes, assisted living facilities, pharmacies and home<br />
health services such as Alzheimer family assistance.</p>
<p>7)  The Baucus Plan fails to address this problem of disenfranchised<br />
physicians.  Many physicians in this country have left the practice of medicine, or downsized their practices due to private insurance company abuses, malpractice threats and direct pharmaceutical marketing.  A recent national poll of physicians based on the AMA database demonstrated that 60% of physicians support a single payer National Health Insurance such as Medicare.  A continuation and technological upgrading of our most fair Medicare Health Insurance for all based on the concepts outlined above, would undoubtedly motivate those disenfranchised physicians to return to the profession and bright younger physicians to invigorate the field.</p>
<p>The Baucus plan  is wasteful, inefficient, fragmented, creates a new<br />
redundant bureaucracy and will continue to provide no potential future health improvements for America.  Only an efficient National Health Insurance carrier such as a technologically upgraded Medicare Insurance  company will be able to provide low cost health insurance and pharmaceuticals  for all Americans while maintaining the quality of private physician practices and Hospitals.</p>
<p>H. Green, MD, FACP, FAAD, FACMS</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: splainin2do</title>
		<link>http://swampland.blogs.time.com/2008/11/12/moving-forward-on-health-care/comment-page-2/#comment-20025</link>
		<dc:creator>splainin2do</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 13 Nov 2008 19:19:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://timeswampland.wordpress.com/?p=8165#comment-20025</guid>
		<description>&quot;Rapidly congealing conventional wisdom.&quot;  Yeah, that and $2600 bucks will get you a night in the Lincoln bedroom at the invitation of President Hillary Clinton.  Or is that what Cokie Roberts was serving Ms. Quinn at tea the day after the election?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>"Rapidly congealing conventional wisdom."  Yeah, that and $2600 bucks will get you a night in the Lincoln bedroom at the invitation of President Hillary Clinton.  Or is that what Cokie Roberts was serving Ms. Quinn at tea the day after the election?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ohg Rea Tone</title>
		<link>http://swampland.blogs.time.com/2008/11/12/moving-forward-on-health-care/comment-page-2/#comment-19990</link>
		<dc:creator>Ohg Rea Tone</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 13 Nov 2008 17:44:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://timeswampland.wordpress.com/?p=8165#comment-19990</guid>
		<description>This writer worked in health care finance for 27 years. 

The game is afoot.  Big bucks are at stake.  The ethics of Corporate Accountants is tied to their employer - not to the government.  Be careful with those regulations. .......


http://thefiresidepost.com/2008/11/13/the-job-of-the-corporate-accountant/</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This writer worked in health care finance for 27 years. </p>
<p>The game is afoot.  Big bucks are at stake.  The ethics of Corporate Accountants is tied to their employer - not to the government.  Be careful with those regulations. .......</p>
<p><a href="http://thefiresidepost.com/2008/11/13/the-job-of-the-corporate-accountant/" rel="nofollow">http://thefiresidepost.com/2008/11/13/the-job-of-the-corporate-accountant/</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: In 1993, Bill Clinton irrefutable to put off fitness care reform until his second year, focusing a substitute on putting some points on the go aboard with his deficit-reduction plan and NAFTA. &#124; Natural Health Supplements and Beauty Products Buy</title>
		<link>http://swampland.blogs.time.com/2008/11/12/moving-forward-on-health-care/comment-page-2/#comment-19908</link>
		<dc:creator>In 1993, Bill Clinton irrefutable to put off fitness care reform until his second year, focusing a substitute on putting some points on the go aboard with his deficit-reduction plan and NAFTA. &#124; Natural Health Supplements and Beauty Products Buy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 13 Nov 2008 08:59:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://timeswampland.wordpress.com/?p=8165#comment-19908</guid>
		<description>[...] friend site:  read here Tags: baucus, clinton, committee, health, obama, [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] friend site:  read here Tags: baucus, clinton, committee, health, obama, [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: WitnessLA.com &#187; Blog Archive &#187; MAD MAX&#8230;.and the Big Sky Health Care Plan</title>
		<link>http://swampland.blogs.time.com/2008/11/12/moving-forward-on-health-care/comment-page-2/#comment-19907</link>
		<dc:creator>WitnessLA.com &#187; Blog Archive &#187; MAD MAX&#8230;.and the Big Sky Health Care Plan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 13 Nov 2008 08:03:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://timeswampland.wordpress.com/?p=8165#comment-19907</guid>
		<description>[...] found it both startling and heartening  that someone had either the guts or the foolishness to put forth such a plan even before Obama [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] found it both startling and heartening  that someone had either the guts or the foolishness to put forth such a plan even before Obama [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Shakespeare in GA</title>
		<link>http://swampland.blogs.time.com/2008/11/12/moving-forward-on-health-care/comment-page-2/#comment-19896</link>
		<dc:creator>Shakespeare in GA</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 13 Nov 2008 03:51:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://timeswampland.wordpress.com/?p=8165#comment-19896</guid>
		<description>From Wikipedia: 
.
&quot;The term [socialized medicine] is often used in the U.S. to evoke negative sentiment toward public control of the health care system by associating it with socialism, which has negative connotations in American political culture. As such its usage is controversial. A 2008 poll indicates that Americans are sharply divided when asked about their views of the expression socialized medicine, with a large percentage of Democrats holding favorable views, while a large percentage of Republicans hold unfavorable views. Independents tend to somewhat favor it.&quot; (from http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Socialized_medicine)
.
So, socialized medicine is a wedge-issue phrase.  Got it.  
.
texte, how many kids do you have?  Any dependents on your health care plan?  Any medical bills?  If so, then what&#039;s the problem with government trying to even out the crater-blasted playing field of what passes for health care?  (And if you don&#039;t have kids or dependents or medical bills, then what&#039;s your beef?)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>From Wikipedia:<br />
.<br />
"The term [socialized medicine] is often used in the U.S. to evoke negative sentiment toward public control of the health care system by associating it with socialism, which has negative connotations in American political culture. As such its usage is controversial. A 2008 poll indicates that Americans are sharply divided when asked about their views of the expression socialized medicine, with a large percentage of Democrats holding favorable views, while a large percentage of Republicans hold unfavorable views. Independents tend to somewhat favor it." (from <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Socialized_medicine)" rel="nofollow">http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Socialized_medicine)</a><br />
.<br />
So, socialized medicine is a wedge-issue phrase.  Got it.<br />
.<br />
texte, how many kids do you have?  Any dependents on your health care plan?  Any medical bills?  If so, then what's the problem with government trying to even out the crater-blasted playing field of what passes for health care?  (And if you don't have kids or dependents or medical bills, then what's your beef?)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: stuartzechman</title>
		<link>http://swampland.blogs.time.com/2008/11/12/moving-forward-on-health-care/comment-page-2/#comment-19887</link>
		<dc:creator>stuartzechman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 13 Nov 2008 03:19:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://timeswampland.wordpress.com/?p=8165#comment-19887</guid>
		<description>Thank you so much for your kind words, Kathy!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thank you so much for your kind words, Kathy!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: trifecta</title>
		<link>http://swampland.blogs.time.com/2008/11/12/moving-forward-on-health-care/comment-page-2/#comment-19864</link>
		<dc:creator>trifecta</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 13 Nov 2008 02:22:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://timeswampland.wordpress.com/?p=8165#comment-19864</guid>
		<description>textee, hahahahahahaha. Go read some Bill Kristol. He will show you the way out of the darkness.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>textee, hahahahahahaha. Go read some Bill Kristol. He will show you the way out of the darkness.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
