The Republicans Tonight
As I predicted earlier today, Sarah Palin did just fine. In fact, she delivered a brilliant speech. It was a classic Republican speech--written by Matthew Scully of the Bush speechwriting shop--chock full of conservative populism, a cultural "torpedo" as Chris Mathews is saying as I write this, aimed directly at Barack and Michelle Obama. She was far more effective, using fewer words than the over-the-top Rudy Giuliani, in tearing down the Obama candidacy. There was not much substance--issues don't matter, remember?--and her description of Obama's policies, particularly his tax policies, was quite inaccurate.
But that hardly matters. Palin established herself as a major-league performer, a very effective messenger for the perennial Republican themes of low taxes and strong defense. And a new theme--government reform--that changes the terrain of the election and will have to be forcefully countered by the Democrats. Obama will have to be every bit as sharp--and down to earth--as he was in his speech last week as this goes forward.
Last week, when Bill Clinton began to speak, I thought: this turns this lugubrious convention around. I thought the same as Palin spoke tonight. John McCain, not nearly the speaker that Palin seems to be, has a tough act to follow tomorrow night.
A few minutes later: The speech also very effectively steered Palin away from her extremist views on social issues...and from her differences from McCain on almost every issue--global warming, tax increases, pork--except abortion. It will, obviously, be crucial for Obama and Biden to make clear the inaccuracies in her speech--and her relentless mischaracterizations of Obama's positions, especially taxes.
The more I think about it, Palin's was an authentic, sarcastic, white working-class voice--absent the economic pain at large in the country, the fact that median families have lost $2000 in disposable income during the Bush presidency. The Democrats are betting that the pain will trump the sarcasm this year; the media reaction you're seeing, including my own, comes from the knowledge that sarcasm has trumped pain so often in recent history. The question remains the one Obama raised last week: will this be a big election or a small one?
Add Your Comment:
Most Popular »
- Piling On Desirée Rogers--Is The Social Secretary To Blame For Two Ticketless Boobs At The White House?
- Looking for Reasons to Care About Tiger Woods
- White House Hypocritical Attack on Politico
- Today Lands a Tell-None Interview With the Salahis
- Jay Leno a Failure; Also, Jay Leno a Success
- Cheney: 'No Aspirations' for Further Office
- Through The 2008 Campaign Looking Glass--John McCain on Medicare Cuts, Now And Then
- The Dreaded X
- Is Walking Away from Your Mortgage the Smartest Thing You Can Do?
- The League of Ambivalent Columnists
- Want to Boost Your Memory? Sounds During Sleep Can Help
- Helicopter Parents: The Backlash Against Overparenting
- Tiger Woods Car Crash Bad Publicity for Rich Isleworth
- The End of the 2000s: Goodbye to a Decade from Hell
- Dubai's Woes a Blow to Ambitious Ruler Sheik Mohammed
- Italian Town Dreams of a White (No Foreigners) Christmas
- The Muppets Perform 'Bohemian Rhapsody'
- The Women of Islam
- Could White House Party Crashers the Salahis Go to Jail?
- Study: Loneliness Can Be Contagious













RSS