Re: Inside Today's RBC Meeting
JN-S:
Please accept my sympathy for having to spend an entire Saturday sitting through this. I've been listening on C-SPAN radio, which is the perfect way to do it, because I can do other stuff (like run errands) while they are droning on about Subsection C of Rule 3 or whatever. However, I must say some of the more over-the-top arguments from the Florida and Michigan folks struck me as potentially counterproductive to their cause. Invoking apartheid in this situation, or the Supreme Court in 2000, is likely to annoy the folks who made these rules--and put the state parties on notice as to how they intended to enforce them.
Add Your Comment:
You must be logged in to post a comment.
Most Popular »
- Best of the Decade: Sci-Fi Movies
- Is Harry Reid Burning Out?
- How Will Obama Pay For Stimulus 2.1? (or 3.0, 3.1, whatever you want to call it)
- The Health Reform Abortion Wars, Part Deux
- "How Will Dave Ever Make Fun of Sex Scandals Again?"
- War of the Supermen: Q&A With Matt Idelson
- Why Wells Fargo isn't paying back TARP
- Quinnipiac: Obama Gets Bump on Afghanistan
- Economists Growing More Wary of the Senate Health Bill
- How to Outsmart a Debt Collector
- The Truth Behind the Leaked Climate-Change E-Mails
- Tiger Woods Must Face His Fans' Moral Outrage
- Mexico Witness Protection: Corrupt Program, New Killings
- Helicopter Parents: The Backlash Against Overparenting
- Taiwan: World's Lowest Birthrate Could Affect Society
- Creating Jobs: Can Obama Government Boost Employment?
- How Strong Is the Evidence Against Amanda Knox?
- Time to Give Up the Ghost on Bin Laden
- Humanure: Goodbye, Toilets. Hello, Extreme Composting
- Study: Parents' Sex Talks with Kids Happening Too Late













RSS