100 Years
The McCain campaign has gone rabid-vehement over what they consider distortions of their candidate's desire to remain in Iraq for 100 years. Once again, let's make the distinction: McCain hasn't said he's in favor of a 100 year war...just a 100 year occupation, which he posits, ridiculously, could be as peaceful as the U.S. military presence in Korea or Germany. Moira Whelan has laid out the details of the controversy very clearly here.
My view is that this is a completely legitimate issue: McCain wants to use Iraq as a long-term U.S. military platform in the region. Both Obama and Clinton think that's foolish--a U.S. military presence in Iraq would be a constant irritant--and so do I. My guess is the American people will agree with the Democrats on this one, which is, obviously, why the McCain campaign is trying to deligitimize it.
Add Your Comment:
Most Popular »
- Sex and 'The Saboteur': Dev Talks Nudity in New Game
- My Life as a "Science Fetishist"
- Top 10 Shows of 2009: The Best, and the Rest
- Is the Public Option Dead? Plus, Amendments That Might Actually Matter
- CNN Poll: Man Made Global Warming Takes a Hit
- A Jobs Speech with Elbows
- The Top 10 Games of 2009
- War of the Supermen: Q&A With Matt Idelson
- Best of the Decade: Sci-Fi Movies
- The PlayStation Turns 15, We Reminisce
- That Viral Thing: Facebook's Secret Code
- College Degrees More Expensive, Worth Less in Job Market
- The Truth Behind the Leaked Climate-Change E-Mails
- Mexico Witness Protection: Corrupt Program, New Killings
- India's Friends: Dinner in the U.S., Dessert in Moscow
- Afghanistan War Surge: Might the Taliban Compromise Now?
- Helicopter Parents: The Backlash Against Overparenting
- Taiwan: World's Lowest Birthrate Could Affect Society
- U.S. Doesn't Know Where bin Laden Is; Time to Let Go
- How Strong Is the Evidence Against Amanda Knox?













RSS