Iraq in Perspective
The New York Times reports real progress in Iraq over the past few months. But 575 attacks a week averages out to better than 80 attacks a day. Back in 2005, when I was first contacted by intelligence officers who were disgusted with the Bush Administration's handling of the war, they cited the level of violence--80 attacks a day!--as evidence that things had spun totally out of control.
Now, it may well be that the 80 attacks now are less lethal than the 80 a day were in 2005. Remember, any stray bullet constitutes an "attack." I'd be interested to know how the level of what the military calls "effective attacks"--that is, attacks with casualties or attacks that require a kinetic response--compares to 2005. My guess--given that the Sunni insurgency has pretty much collapsed--is that it would be lower, but who knows?
OOOPs: The link above was to a similar story in the Washington Post--which sort of makes the point that life in Iraq is still pretty dangerous. Here's the New York Times piece.
Add Your Comment:
Most Popular »
- A Final Palin Post
- He Had a First Name. It Was O-S-C-A-R.
- Palin's Super Powers Explained
- Swampland Has A New Look!
- One Last Big (Yet Moving) Show for Michael
- Here's A Test
- Health Care: Back to the Drawing Board
- Baby Hand-Me-Downs Are Suddenly Trendy
- Sacha Baron Cohen Is... Himself!
- Hair Shirt
- Why Are Southerners So Fat?
- What Does Life-Extending Drug Mean for Humans?
- The Outsider: Where Is Sarah Palin Going Next?
- Oh Crap! My Parents Joined Facebook
- Obama: Getting Down to the Hard Choices
- Florida Wrestles with Its Python Problem
- After California: Which States Are in the Most Peril?
- Yes, I Suck: Self-Help Through Negative Thinking
- Google's Chrome: Taking Aim at Microsoft - and the iPhone
- Advice from an Economist Who Saw 1929











RSS