The Iraq Report
Josh Marshall on today's Washington Post report about the utter futility of trying to limit the testimony of Petraeus and Crocker:
Perhaps I'm missing something. But doesn't this sound like the anxiety is a little more pronounced on the White House side since they're the ones trying to bag on the report that has been the building focus of our Iraq policy for months now?
Absolutely right about that. But there is a misunderstanding here: Who writes the report was never really the issue. The White House wrote the last interim report, delivered circa July 15. The legislation says that it's the Administration's duty to issue a progress report to Congress.
The real controversy is that the White House seems to believe that it could get Petraeus and Crocker--both of whom will probably lambaste the current Iraqi government (and perhaps the Iraqi armed forces)--to testify in private. Ain't gonna happen.
Add Your Comment:
Most Popular »
- Sex and 'The Saboteur': Dev Talks Nudity in New Game
- My Life as a "Science Fetishist"
- Top 10 Shows of 2009: The Best, and the Rest
- CNN Poll: Man Made Global Warming Takes a Hit
- A Jobs Speech with Elbows
- War of the Supermen: Q&A With Matt Idelson
- The Top 10 Games of 2009
- Best of the Decade: Sci-Fi Movies
- The PlayStation Turns 15, We Reminisce
- CT Sen Poll: Dodd Trailing All Foes
- That Viral Thing: Facebook's Secret Code
- The Truth Behind the Leaked Climate-Change E-Mails
- College Degrees More Expensive, Worth Less in Job Market
- Mexico Witness Protection: Corrupt Program, New Killings
- Helicopter Parents: The Backlash Against Overparenting
- Taiwan: World's Lowest Birthrate Could Affect Society
- India's Friends: Dinner in the U.S., Dessert in Moscow
- Afghanistan War Surge: Might the Taliban Compromise Now?
- How Strong Is the Evidence Against Amanda Knox?
- U.S. Doesn't Know Where bin Laden Is; Time to Let Go













RSS