The Iraq Report
Josh Marshall on today's Washington Post report about the utter futility of trying to limit the testimony of Petraeus and Crocker:
Perhaps I'm missing something. But doesn't this sound like the anxiety is a little more pronounced on the White House side since they're the ones trying to bag on the report that has been the building focus of our Iraq policy for months now?
Absolutely right about that. But there is a misunderstanding here: Who writes the report was never really the issue. The White House wrote the last interim report, delivered circa July 15. The legislation says that it's the Administration's duty to issue a progress report to Congress.
The real controversy is that the White House seems to believe that it could get Petraeus and Crocker--both of whom will probably lambaste the current Iraqi government (and perhaps the Iraqi armed forces)--to testify in private. Ain't gonna happen.
Add Your Comment:
Most Popular »
- A Final Palin Post
- He Had a First Name. It Was O-S-C-A-R.
- Palin's Super Powers Explained
- Swampland Has A New Look!
- Baby Hand-Me-Downs Are Suddenly Trendy
- One Last Big (Yet Moving) Show for Michael
- Here's A Test
- All ready to sign up for John Meriwether's next fund?
- Health Care: Back to the Drawing Board
- The Crowds In Ghana
- Why Are Southerners So Fat?
- What Does Life-Extending Drug Mean for Humans?
- The Outsider: Where Is Sarah Palin Going Next?
- Florida Wrestles with Its Python Problem
- Oh Crap! My Parents Joined Facebook
- Obama: Getting Down to the Hard Choices
- After California: Which States Are in the Most Peril?
- Google's Chrome: Taking Aim at Microsoft - and the iPhone
- Yes, I Suck: Self-Help Through Negative Thinking
- Advice from an Economist Who Saw 1929












RSS