"Our Enemies are Those Who Harbor Terrorists"
The foolishness of the war in Iraq--the diversion of resources from the real Salafist enemy--has been apparent to most U.S. intelligence operatives, especially those in the CIA, from the very start. Which is why Cheney, Feith et al spent so much energy trying to discredit CIA in the first Bush term.
And now we have an NIE that pretty much says that. Pakistan--not Iran, not Iraq--is the scariest country in the world today: an Islamic country with nuclear weapons, ruled by a military dictator whose military and intelligence service has a significant Salafist element.
The question is, what do we do? What happens if we move against the REAL Al Qaeda with special forces? (An actual invasion of Pakistan would be ridiculous.) What do the candidates for President think about that? Doesn't this argue for a shift in focus, and resources, away from Iraq? How should we reorder our military priorities in the region to meet the actual threat? Isn't this what the political debate should be about now?
Add Your Comment:
Most Popular »
- Sex and 'The Saboteur': Dev Talks Nudity in New Game
- My Life as a "Science Fetishist"
- Top 10 Shows of 2009: The Best, and the Rest
- CNN Poll: Man Made Global Warming Takes a Hit
- A Jobs Speech with Elbows
- War of the Supermen: Q&A With Matt Idelson
- The Top 10 Games of 2009
- Best of the Decade: Sci-Fi Movies
- The PlayStation Turns 15, We Reminisce
- CT Sen Poll: Dodd Trailing All Foes
- That Viral Thing: Facebook's Secret Code
- The Truth Behind the Leaked Climate-Change E-Mails
- College Degrees More Expensive, Worth Less in Job Market
- Mexico Witness Protection: Corrupt Program, New Killings
- Helicopter Parents: The Backlash Against Overparenting
- Taiwan: World's Lowest Birthrate Could Affect Society
- India's Friends: Dinner in the U.S., Dessert in Moscow
- Afghanistan War Surge: Might the Taliban Compromise Now?
- How Strong Is the Evidence Against Amanda Knox?
- U.S. Doesn't Know Where bin Laden Is; Time to Let Go













RSS