Today's Alterman--Continued
Several readers have wondered why I'm wasting my time with Eric Alterman. (Here's today's attack on me, by the way).
Here's why: I've noticed that a fair number of readers have, shall we say, a slightly inaccurate impression about who I am and what I care about. Where do they get these ideas? From intellectually dishonest bloggers like Alterman. Why intellectually dishonest? Because he sarcastically calls me Time's "most liberal" columnist and never once--not once--links to something "liberal" that I've written. I only appear on his radar screen when I criticize Democrats, which--yes--I sometimes do...but not nearly as often as I've criticized Republicans, especially during the past six years. A fairly flagrant case of bias, I would say.
The first time I met Alterman, nearly twenty years ago, I was under attack by assorted New York liberals for taking the shocking position that Daniel Patrick Moynihan was right: that out-of-wedlock births were helping to destroy the black community. The evidence of the disaster was coming in strong, and liberals refused to even consider the problem--until William Julius Wilson broke the silence with his fine book, The Truly Disadvantaged, and even then Wilson was accused, as I was, of "blaming the victim." In any case, Alterman introduced himself to me at a party around that time and said, "Doesn't it bother you that everybody hates you so much?"
"Not at all," I told him. (Actually, most people kind of liked what I was writing in those days--just none of the people Alterman hung with). I was describing what I saw in the poorest neighborhoods, but I was also regularly writing about creative ideas to solve the problems.
I've taken non-stop crap from Alterman ever since, and tried to ignore it. But now I'm living in his world--your world, the blogosphere--and I'm just not going to let him get away with his persistent intellectual dishonesty. (Even Atrios, with whom i've had some disagreements--to say the least--has linked to posts of mine that he thought worthy).
I'll try not to waste any valuable blogospace on this matter in the future. I won't even link to Alterman's attack on me tomorrow...or whenever. I just wanted you to know that he's not reliable.
Add Your Comment:
Most Popular »
- Sex and 'The Saboteur': Dev Talks Nudity in New Game
- My Life as a "Science Fetishist"
- Is the Public Option Dead? Plus, Amendments That Might Actually Matter
- Top 10 Shows of 2009: The Best, and the Rest
- CNN Poll: Man Made Global Warming Takes a Hit
- A Jobs Speech with Elbows
- The Top 10 Games of 2009
- War of the Supermen: Q&A With Matt Idelson
- Best of the Decade: Sci-Fi Movies
- "How Will Dave Ever Make Fun of Sex Scandals Again?"
- That Viral Thing: Facebook's Secret Code
- College Degrees More Expensive, Worth Less in Job Market
- The Truth Behind the Leaked Climate-Change E-Mails
- Mexico Witness Protection: Corrupt Program, New Killings
- India's Friends: Dinner in the U.S., Dessert in Moscow
- Afghanistan War Surge: Might the Taliban Compromise Now?
- Helicopter Parents: The Backlash Against Overparenting
- Taiwan: World's Lowest Birthrate Could Affect Society
- U.S. Doesn't Know Where bin Laden Is; Time to Let Go
- How Strong Is the Evidence Against Amanda Knox?













RSS